...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sustainable Development >Design of Performance Improvement Factors (PIFs) for Sustainable Development Indicators (SDIs) Metrics for Oil Sands Projects with Application to Surface Mining Operations Based on Continual Performance Improvement (CPI)
【24h】

Design of Performance Improvement Factors (PIFs) for Sustainable Development Indicators (SDIs) Metrics for Oil Sands Projects with Application to Surface Mining Operations Based on Continual Performance Improvement (CPI)

机译:基于持续绩效改进(CPI)的油砂项目可持续发展指标(SDIs)度量标准的绩效改进因子(PIF)设计及其在露天采矿中的应用

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The sustainability assessment approach utilized in the development of the WA-PA-SU project sustainability rating system includes three distinctive areas of knowledge: sustainability, continuous performance improvement, and multi-criteria decision-making. Previously, the study of sustainability led to (1) concluding the need for the development of a rating system for industrial projects, with a particular application to oil sands and heavy oil projects; (2) defining the structure of the rating system; and (3) assisting in the pre-selection of sustainable development indicators (SDIs) for surface mining operations. Assessing the sustainability of projects at certain points in time required the application of a methodology selected by the interested groups and/or stakeholders; however, measuring the improvement of projects in sustainable development performance over time (i.e., continuous performance improvement) presents additional challenges. Certain industries (i.e., oil & gas), projects (i.e., oil sands or heavy oil), or specific operations (i.e., surface mining) require a rating system with a particular level of flexibility, offering the opportunity for developers to improve the performance of operations, and for stakeholders to understand the difficulties-and benefits-of implementing SDIs and perform up to levels of truly sustainable development. The present manuscript introduces the performance improvement factor (PIF), which can be determined using three different methodologies: relevance factor or subjective stakeholder valuation, comparative assessment methods, and links to metrics. Additionally, the continuous performance improvement (CPI) indicator measurement is suggested and discussed for a pre-selected set of SDIs for surface mining operations in oil sands projects. Finally, a brief preamble discusses the proposed integrated approach for sustainability assessment and the part it plays in continual performance improvement, offering a foreword to upcoming manuscripts that discuss the other complementary parts of the integrated approach.
机译:WA-PA-SU项目可持续性评级系统的开发中采用的可持续性评估方法包括三个独特的知识领域:可持续性,持续绩效改进和多标准决策。以前,对可持续性的研究导致(1)得出结论,需要开发工业项目的评级系统,特别是在油砂和重油项目中的应用; (2)确定评级体系的结构; (3)协助为露天采矿业务预先选择可持续发展指标(SDI)。在某些时候评估项目的可持续性需要采用感兴趣的团体和/或利益相关者选择的方法;然而,随着时间的推移,衡量项目在可持续发展绩效方面的改进(即持续绩效改进)提出了其他挑战。某些行业(例如,石油和天然气),项目(例如,油砂或重油)或特定操作(例如,地面采矿)需要具有特定灵活性级别的评级系统,从而为开发人员提供了改善性能的机会利益相关者了解实施SDI的困难和收益,并达到真正的可持续发展水平。本手稿介绍了绩效提高因子(PIF),可以使用三种不同的方法来确定:关联因子或主观利益相关方评估,比较评估方法以及与度量的链接。此外,建议并讨论了针对油砂项目中地面采矿作业的一组预先选择的SDI的持续性能改进(CPI)指标测量。最后,简短的序言讨论了提议的可持续性评估集成方法及其在持续绩效改进中所扮演的角色,为即将讨论该集成方法其他互补部分的手稿提供了序言。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号