首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine >Rapid assessment of insect fauna based on local knowledge: comparing ecological and ethnobiological methods
【24h】

Rapid assessment of insect fauna based on local knowledge: comparing ecological and ethnobiological methods

机译:根据当地知识快速评估昆虫区系:比较生态学和民族生物学方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The rapid assessment of biodiversity making use of surveys of local knowledge has been successful for different biological?taxa. However, there are no reports on the testing of such tools for sampling insect fauna. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of different ethnobiological techniques for rapid sampling of insect fauna. Methods Field research for the conventional survey of insect fauna was conducted on?a private?farm (9 ° 43'38.95 "S, 37 ° 45'11.97" W) , where there was intensive cultivation of okra ( Abelmoschus esculentus L. (Moench)). The survey of local entomological knowledge was conducted among all the producers of okra living in the rural villages Pereira, Santa Luzia, and Nassau de Souza, within the Jacaré Curituba?irrigated settlement scheme. The combined use of the techniques “free list” and projective interviews was analyzed, using two types of visual stimuli: stock photos and an entomological box. Results During the conventional survey of insect fauna, the species Bemisia tabaci biotype B, Aphis gossypii , Phenacoccus sp., Icerya purchasi and Lagria villosa were the primary pests found in the okra crop. Regarding the survey of insect pests, the results?were convergent in both techniques (conventional sampling and free list). Comparing the interview with visual stimuli (pictures) and specimen witnesses (entomological box) revealed that the latter was more effective. Conclusion Techniques based on the recording and analysis of local knowledge about insects are effective for quick sampling of pest insects, but ineffective in sampling predator insects. The utilization of collected insects, infested branches, or photos of the symptoms of damage caused by pests in projective interviews is recommended.
机译:背景技术利用当地知识调查对生物多样性进行快速评估已成功地适用于不同的生物分类单元。但是,目前尚无关于对此类昆虫昆虫取样工具进行测试的报道。本研究旨在评估昆虫生物学快速采样的不同民族生物学技术的效率。方法在一个私人农场(9°43'38.95“ S,37°45'11.97” W)上进行了常规昆虫区系调查的田间研究,在该农场中,黄秋葵(Abelmoschus esculentus L. ))。在JacaréCurituba灌溉定居点计划内,生活在乡村Perera,Santa Luzia和Nassau de Souza的秋葵的所有生产者中,对当地昆虫学知识进行了调查。使用两种类型的视觉刺激,分析了“自由列表”和投影访谈技术的结合使用:图片和昆虫学盒。结果在常规昆虫动物调查中,烟粉虱为黄秋葵的主要害虫,其中烟粉虱为B型烟粉虱,棉蚜,苯丙球菌,冰丝紫薇和长毛紫薇。关于害虫调查,结果在两种技术(常规采样和自由列表)上都趋于一致。将访谈与视觉刺激(图片)和标本目击者(昆虫学框)进行比较后发现,后者更为有效。结论基于对当地昆虫知识的记录和分析的技术可用于对害虫的快速采样,但对捕食性昆虫的采样则无效。建议在投影访谈中使用收集的昆虫,出没的树枝或有害生物造成的损害症状照片。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号