首页> 外文期刊>Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology >ACTIVITIES OF THE PAN-CANADIAN PHARMACEUTICAL ALLIANCE: AN OBSERVATIONAL ANALYSIS
【24h】

ACTIVITIES OF THE PAN-CANADIAN PHARMACEUTICAL ALLIANCE: AN OBSERVATIONAL ANALYSIS

机译:泛加拿大制药联盟的活动:观察性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA) was established in 2010 to negotiate confidential prices for drugs coming forward from Canada’s centralized health technology assessment (HTA) agency reviews, on behalf of the participating public drug plans. Objective To analyze the activities of the pCPA, to determine: alignment of HTA agency recommendations and pCPA negotiation decisions; the role of health economics in pCPA activities; and patterns of implicit prioritization. Methods The analysis was based on the archive of drugs handled through the pCPA, as posted on its website. The period of observation was from inception to August 31, 2017. HTA recommendations were sourced from the websites of the Common Drug Review (CDR) and the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review. Descriptive and statistical analyses were conducted. Results The dataset contained 206 drug-indication pairings. There was close but imperfect alignment between HTA agency recommendations and the pCPA’s decisions to negotiate; deviations occurred only with CDR-reviewed drugs. The median incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of negotiated drugs was $168K/QALY for oncology drugs, but $70K/QALY for non-oncology drugs. The time to initiate negotiations was dramatically shorter for oncology versus non-oncology drugs (mean 54 versus 263 days) and also differed between therapeutic areas at CDR. The time required for PCPA activity was surprisingly similar for drugs recommended without a price condition and for those conditional on a price reduction.
机译:背景泛加拿大制药联盟(pCPA)成立于2010年,旨在代表参与的公共药物计划,就加拿大中央卫生技术评估(HTA)机构审查得出的药物保密价格进行谈判。目的分析pCPA的活动,以确定:HTA机构建议和pCPA谈判决定的一致性;卫生经济学在pCPA活动中的作用;和隐式优先级排序的模式。方法该分析基于通过pCPA处理的药品档案,该档案已发布在其网站上。观察期为从成立到2017年8月31日。HTA建议来自《通用药物评论》(CDR)和泛加拿大肿瘤学药物评论网站。进行描述性和统计性分析。结果数据集包含206种药物指示配对。 HTA机构的建议与pCPA的谈判决定之间存在紧密但不完善的一致性;仅在CDR审查的药物中发生偏差。对于肿瘤药物,协商药物的中位成本效益比中位数为$ 168K / QALY,但对于非肿瘤药物,为$ 70K / QALY。与非肿瘤药物相比,开始肿瘤治疗的时间大大缩短了(平均54天与263天),而且CDR的治疗范围也有所不同。对于没有价格条件的推荐药物和以降价为条件的药物,PCPA活性所需的时间令人惊讶地相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号