首页> 外文期刊>Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology >IMPACT OF DRUG EXPOSURE DEFINITIONS ON OBSERVED ASSOCIATIONS IN PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY RESEARCH
【24h】

IMPACT OF DRUG EXPOSURE DEFINITIONS ON OBSERVED ASSOCIATIONS IN PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY RESEARCH

机译:药物接触定义对药物流行病学研究的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND A variety of methods used to define exposure in pharmacoepidemiological studies. Although each method has known biases, the relative effect of these biases on an observed association has not been fully examined. OBJECTIVE To explore the influence of different exposure definitions on estimates, using the association between met- formin and all-cause mortality as a proto-typical model. METHODS New users of oral anti-hyperglycemic drugs identified using administrative health databases from Alberta, Canada between 1998 and 2010. Drug exposure was described using definitions that are commonly used in observational studies. All analyses included the same covariates of age, gender, and a comorbidity score, and subjects not exposed to metformin served as the reference group. The measure of association assessed using a Cox Proportional Hazards model for cohort studies and conditional logistic regression for case- control studies. RESULTS We identified 64,293 new oral anti-hyperglycemic drugs users; mean age 68.9 years, 33,131 (52%) males, and 24,745 (39%) deaths during a mean follow-up of 6 years. In adjusted models, the association between metformin and mortality ranged from 0.23 (95% CI 0.22–0.25) to 0.96 (95% CI 0.93–0.99). Most metforminexposure definitions, however, provided estimates in the 0.6–0.8 reduction range, aligning with the resultsof previous observational studies.CONCLUSIONSThe variety of exposure definitions tested in this analysis produced a wide range of associations betweenmetformin and mortality risk. Therefore, pharmacoepidemiological studies should include sensitivityanalyses using at least two exposure definitions with complementary risks of bias to improve the validityof study results.
机译:背景技术在药物流行病学研究中用于定义暴露的多种方法。尽管每种方法都有已知的偏差,但是尚未完全检查这些偏差对观察到的关联的相对影响。目的使用甲福明和全因死亡率之间的关联作为典型模型,探索不同暴露定义对估计值的影响。方法1998年至2010年间,使用来自加拿大艾伯塔省的行政健康数据库确定了口服抗高血糖药物的新用户。使用观察性研究中常用的定义描述了药物暴露。所有分析均包括相同的年龄,性别和合并症评分的协变量,并且未暴露于二甲双胍的受试者作为参考组。联合测量使用Cox比例危险模型进行队列研究,而条件对数回归用于病例对照研究。结果我们确定了64,293名新的口服降血糖药使用者;平均随访6年,平均年龄68.9岁,男性33,131(52%),死亡24,745(39%)。在调整后的模型中,二甲双胍与死亡率之间的关联性从0.23(95%CI 0.22–0.25)到0.96(95%CI 0.93–0.99)。然而,大多数二甲双胍暴露定义提供了0.6-0.8降低范围的估计值,与先前的观察性研究结果相吻合。结论本分析中测试的多种暴露定义在二甲双胍和死亡风险之间产生了广泛的关联。因此,药物流行病学研究应包括敏感性分析,至少使用两种暴露定义以及具有补充性偏倚的风险,以提高研究结果的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号