首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Priority interventions to improve the management of chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: a participatory research of the ACCORD program
【24h】

Priority interventions to improve the management of chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: a participatory research of the ACCORD program

机译:优先干预措施,以改善初级保健中慢性非癌性疼痛的管理:ACCORD计划的参与性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: There is evidence that the management of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) in primary care is far from being optimal. A 1-day workshop was held to explore the perceptions of key actors regarding the challenges and priority interventions to improve CNCP management in primary care. Methods: Using the Chronic Care Model as a conceptual framework, physicians (n=6), pharmacists (n=6), nurses (n=6), physiotherapists (n=6), psychologists (n=6), pain specialists (n=6), patients (n=3), family members (n=3), decision makers and managers (n=4), and pain researchers (n=7) took part in seven focus groups and five nominal groups. Results: Challenges identified in focus group discussions were related to five dimensions: knowledge gap, “work in silos”, lack of awareness that CNCP represents an important clinical problem, difficulties in access to health professionals and services, and patient empowerment needs. Based on the nominal group discussions, the following priority interventions were identified: interdisciplinary continuing education, interdisciplinary treatment approach, regional expert leadership, creation and definition of care paths, and patient education programs. Conclusion: Barriers to optimal management of CNCP in primary care are numerous. Improving its management cannot be envisioned without considering multifaceted interventions targeting several dimensions of the Chronic Care Model and focusing on both clinicians and patients.
机译:目的:有证据表明,初级保健中慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)的治疗远非最佳。举行了为期一天的研讨会,探讨了关键行为者对改善初级保健中CNCP管理的挑战和优先干预措施的看法。方法:使用慢性护理模型作为概念框架,医生(n = 6),药剂师(n = 6),护士(n = 6),物理治疗师(n = 6),心理学家(n = 6),疼痛专家( n = 6),患者(n = 3),家庭成员(n = 3),决策者和管理者(n = 4)以及疼痛研究人员(n = 7)参加了七个焦点小组和五个名义小组。结果:在焦点小组讨论中确定的挑战涉及五个方面:知识差距,“孤岛上的工作”,缺乏对CNCP代表重要临床问题的认识,难以获得卫生专业人员和服务以及患者赋权的需求。根据名义上的小组讨论,确定了以下优先干预措施:跨学科继续教育,跨学科治疗方法,区域专家领导,护理路径的创建和定义以及患者教育计划。结论:在初级保健中对CNCP进行最佳管理的障碍很多。如果不考虑针对慢性护理模型的多个方面并针对临床医生和患者的多方面干预措施,就无法设想改善其管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号