...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ophthalmology >Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of the Anterior Capsulotomy Edge: A Comparative Study between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsulotomy and Manual Capsulorhexis
【24h】

Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of the Anterior Capsulotomy Edge: A Comparative Study between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsulotomy and Manual Capsulorhexis

机译:前囊切开术边缘的扫描电子显微镜分析:飞秒激光辅助囊切开术与人工囊膜切开术的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose. To compare the capsule edges ultrastructure obtained by two femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) platforms and manual continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Setting. Eye Clinic, University of Trieste, Italy. Design. Experimental comparative study. Methods. 150 anterior capsules were collected and divided into three groups as follows Group 1 (50 capsules) obtained with manual CCC, Groups 2 and 3 (each with 50 capsules) obtained with the Catalys Laser and the LenSx Laser, respectively. All samples were imaged by means of SEM and regularity of the cut surface, and thickness of the capsule edge were evaluated and compared. Results. All femtosecond laser (FSL) capsules were perfectly circular, whereas some alteration of the circular shape was observed in the manual ones. Group 1 showed a smooth and regular capsule edge without any surface irregularity, conversely Groups 2 and 3 showed postage-stamp perforations on the capsule edge. The cut surface irregularity value in Group 2 was 1.4 ± 0.63, while it was 0.7 ± 0.49 in Group 3 (). Group 1 had a significantly lower thickness of the capsule edge than the FSL groups (). No statistically significant difference in the capsule edge thickness between the FSL groups was found ().Conclusions. Despite the presence of slight cut surface irregularities, both FSL capsulotomies showed a better geometry and circularity than the manual ones. Capsulotomy specimens obtained using both FSL capsulotomies showed laser-induced alterations of the capsule edge when compared with smooth and regular edges obtained using manual CCC.
机译:目的。为了比较通过两个飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)平台和手动连续曲线撕囊术(CCC)使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)获得的胶囊边缘超微结构。设置。意大利的里雅斯特大学眼科。设计。实验比较研究。方法。收集150个前囊,将其分为三组,分别为通过手动CCC获得的第1组(50粒胶囊),通过Catalys Laser和LenSx Laser获得的第2组和第3组(每组50粒胶囊)。通过SEM对所有样品进行成像,并且对切割表面的规则性进行评估,并比较胶囊边缘的厚度。结果。所有飞秒激光(FSL)胶囊都是完美的圆形,而在手动胶囊中观察到圆形的某些变化。第1组显示光滑且规则的囊边缘,没有任何表面不规则性,相反,第2和第3组在囊边缘显示邮资-戳孔。第2组的切割表面不规则值为1.4±0.63,而第3组的为0.7±0.49()。与FSL组()相比,第1组的囊袋边缘厚度显着降低。在FSL组之间没有发现胶囊边缘厚度的统计学显着差异()。尽管存在轻微的切割表面不规则现象,但两种FSL切囊仪均显示出比手动方法更好的几何形状和圆度。与使用手动CCC获得的光滑边缘和规则边缘相比,使用两种FSL囊切术获得的囊切开术标本均显示出激光诱导的囊膜边缘改变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号