首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry >Comparison of resorption rate of primary teeth treated with alternative lesion sterilization and tissue repair and conventional endodontic treatment: An in vivo randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Comparison of resorption rate of primary teeth treated with alternative lesion sterilization and tissue repair and conventional endodontic treatment: An in vivo randomized clinical trial

机译:替代病灶灭菌和组织修复与常规牙髓治疗的乳牙吸收率的比较:一项体内随机临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Complete pulpectomy and elimination of wide range of microorganisms from infected primary root canals is not possible through conventional endodontic procedures. Thus, lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) therapy employing 3Mix tri-antibiotic paste have been used as an alternative endodontic modality for infected primary teeth. Aim: This study aims to evaluate the root resorption rate of endodontically treated mandibular primary molars with conventional endodontic treatment or LSTR therapy and to compare it with their healthy contralateral teeth. Materials and Methods: Fifty carious first and second primary mandibular molars from 25 healthy children aged 7–10 years were treated with two different endodontic procedures using LSTR Therapy and conventional endodontic treatment. The resorption rate of these teeth with healthy contralateral teeth was compared clinically and radiographically at 3, 6, 12 and 36 months using Chi-square test. Results: At 12 months, clinically, there was no difference in the outcomes of both groups but radiographically, statistically significant difference (P Conclusions: LSTR therapy could be a viable treatment modality for infectedonvital primary molars with poor prognosis and intended to be maintained for shorter duration in the oral cavity as natural space maintainers.
机译:背景:通过常规的牙髓治疗方法不可能彻底进行牙髓切除术并从受感染的根管中清除多种微生物。因此,使用3Mix三抗生素糊剂的病灶灭菌和组织修复(LSTR)治疗已被用作感染的乳牙的另一种牙髓治疗方法。目的:本研究旨在评估采用常规牙髓治疗或LSTR治疗的经牙髓治疗的下颌原发磨牙的根吸收率,并将其与健康的对侧牙齿进行比较。材料和方法:对25名7-10岁健康儿童的50个龋齿的第一和第二下颌磨牙进行了两种不同的牙髓治疗,分别使用LSTR治疗和常规牙髓治疗。使用卡方检验,分别在3、6、12和36个月时对这些牙齿与健康对侧牙齿的吸收率进行了临床和影像学比较。结果:在临床上的12个月时,两组的结局无差异,但影像学上的差异有统计学意义(P结论:LSTR治疗可能是感染性/非关键性原发性磨牙的一种可行的治疗方式,预后较差,可以维持作为天然空间维持剂,在口腔中持续时间较短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号