...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Medical Research >The Effect of Nimodipine Monotherapy and Combined Treatment with Ketamine and Lignocaine in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage
【24h】

The Effect of Nimodipine Monotherapy and Combined Treatment with Ketamine and Lignocaine in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage

机译:尼莫地平单药治疗及氯胺酮和利格卡因联合治疗对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The clinical effects of nimodipine monotherapy were compared with the effects of nimodipine combined with ketamine and lignocaine (combination therapy) in a single-centre, one investigator, open study in patients with proven aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH). After clipping of the aneurysm, nimodipine was administered intravenously until day 5 – 7 after clipping. Thereafter the intravenous nimodipine was substituted by oral doses of nimodipine. These were decreased gradually and then discontinued within the following 6 days. For combination therapy, nimodipine was given together with both a bolus injection of 1 μg/kg ketamine followed by an infusion of the drug at a rate of 3 μg/kg/min and a bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg lignocaine followed by an infusion of the drug at a rate of 12 μg/kg/min. During the study period, 173 patients were admitted to the hospital with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Of these patients, 115 with a proven aneurysm were operated on and evaluated: 66 patients received nimodipine monotherapy and 49 were given nimodipine combined with ketamine and lignocaine. These subgroups were comparable in terms of the baseline characteristics (age, Hunt and Hess score). The (baseline corrected) Hunt and Hess scores after surgery and a 0 – 5 clinical outcome score were applied as indices for clinical effects. Patients receiving nimodipine monotherapy and combined therapy showed a significant clinical improvement compared to baseline (P = 0.001 and P = 0.006, respectively). The beneficial effect of nimodipine monotherapy is in line with previous double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Although nimodipine monotherapy seems to be more effective than combined treatment, this was not statistically significant. Our data indicate that combined treatment with ketamine and lignocaine is not more effective than nimodipine monotherapy in patients with mild aSAH, but this does not rule out an effect in severe cases. There was no indication of a pharmacodynamic interaction between nimodipine and co-medication. No serious or clinically relevant adverse reactions were noted during the study.
机译:在一项单中心,一名研究者的开放性研究中,将尼莫地平单药治疗的临床效果与尼莫地平联合氯胺酮和利诺卡因的疗效(联合治疗)进行比较,以证实患有动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)的患者。夹闭动脉瘤后,尼莫地平经静脉给药直至夹闭后第5-7天。此后,静脉内尼莫地平被口服剂量的尼莫地平代替。这些逐渐减少,然后在接下来的6天内停用。对于联合治疗,尼莫地平与大剂量注射1μg/ kg氯胺酮一起给药,然后以3μg/ kg / min的速率输注药物,然后大剂量注射1.5 mg / kg利多卡因,然后进行输注药物的速率为12μg/ kg / min。在研究期间,有173例因蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)入院的患者。在这些患者中,有115例经证实具有动脉瘤的患者接受了手术和评估:66例接受尼莫地平单药治疗的患者,49例接受了尼莫地平联合氯胺酮和利多卡因的治疗。这些亚组在基线特征(年龄,Hunt和Hess得分)方面具有可比性。手术后的(经过基线校正)Hunt和Hess评分以及0-5临床结果评分被用作临床效果的指标。与基线相比,接受尼莫地平单药治疗和联合治疗的患者显示出显着的临床改善(分别为P = 0.001和P = 0.006)。尼莫地平单药治疗的有益作用与以前的双盲,安慰剂对照研究一致。尽管尼莫地平单药治疗似乎比联合治疗更有效,但这在统计学上并不显着。我们的数据表明,在轻度aSAH患者中,氯胺酮和利多卡因的联合治疗并不比尼莫地平单药治疗更有效,但这并不排除严重情况下的疗效。没有迹象表明尼莫地平与联合用药之间存在药效相互作用。研究期间未发现严重或临床相关的不良反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号