首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry >Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and recharge of pre-reacted glass ionomer composite and nano-ionomeric glass ionomer with daily fluoride exposure: An in vitro study
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and recharge of pre-reacted glass ionomer composite and nano-ionomeric glass ionomer with daily fluoride exposure: An in vitro study

机译:每天暴露于氟化物下的预反应玻璃离聚物复合材料和纳米离聚物玻璃离聚物的氟化物释放和再填充的比较评估:一项体外研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: This in vitro study was designed to investigate the effects of daily fluoride exposures on fluoride release and recharge by prereacted glass ionomer (PRG) composite and nano-ionomeric glass ionomer. Materials and Methods: Seventy-two specimens (36 of each material) were prepared and by placing the restorative materials into Teflon mold. Each specimen was subjected to one of three daily treatments (n = 12): (1) No fluoride treatment (control); (2) application of a fluoride dentifrice (1,000 ppm) once daily; and (3) the same regimen as (2), plus immersion in a 0.05% sodium fluoride (NaF) mouth rinse (225 ppm) immediately following the dentifrice application. Specimens were suspended in a storage vial containing 10 ml demineralizing solution for 6 h and transferred to a new test tube containing 10 ml remineralizing solution for 18 h. Fluoride treatments of the specimens were completed every day prior to their immersion in the demineralizing solution. Media solutions were buffered with equal volumes of total ionic strength adjustment buffer (TISAB) II; fluoride levels were measured using a digital ion analyzer and fluoride electrode throughout the 21 day duration of the experiment. Results: Nano-ionomeric glass ionomer showed a better amount of fluoride release than PRG composite irrespective of the fluoride treatment supplementation (P 0.01). Additional fluoride supplementation improved fluoride release and recharge ability for both the materials when compared to their respective control groups. The fluoride recharge for both materials did not show any sustained pattern of release. Conclusion: Nano-ionomeric glass ionomer demonstrated a greater ability to release and recharge compared with that of PRG composite.
机译:目的:该体外研究旨在研究每日氟化物暴露对预反应玻璃离聚物(PRG)复合材料和纳米离聚物玻璃离聚物释放氟化物和再充电的影响。材料和方法:准备了72个样品(每种材料36个),并将修复材料放入特氟隆模具中。每个样品接受以下三种日常处理之一(n = 12):(1)不进行氟化物处理(对照); (2)每天施用一次氟化洁牙剂(1,000 ppm); (3)与(2)相同的方案,并在洁牙剂施用后立即浸入0.05%的氟化钠(NaF)漱口液(225 ppm)中。将样品悬浮在装有10 ml矿物质溶液的存储瓶中6 h,然后转移到装有10 ml矿物质溶液的新试管中18 h。在将样品浸入脱盐溶液之前,每天都要对样品进行氟化处理。用等体积的总离子强度调节缓冲液(TISAB)II缓冲培养基溶液;在整个实验的21天中,使用数字离子分析仪和氟化物电极测量氟化物含量。结果:纳米离聚物玻璃离聚物显示出比PRG复合材料更好的氟化物释放量,而与氟化物处理无关(P <0.01)。与它们各自的对照组相比,额外的氟化物补充改善了两种材料的氟化物释放和再充电能力。两种材料的氟化物补给都没有显示任何持续的释放模式。结论:与PRG复合材料相比,纳米离聚物玻璃离聚物具有更高的释放和再充电能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号