首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies >Assessment of soil erosion and conservation on agricultural sloping lands using plot data in the semi-arid hilly loess region of China
【24h】

Assessment of soil erosion and conservation on agricultural sloping lands using plot data in the semi-arid hilly loess region of China

机译:基于样点数据的中国半干旱黄土丘陵区农业坡地土壤侵蚀与保护评价。

获取原文
           

摘要

Highlights ? We examine runoff and soil loss at slope angles up to 30°. ? We compare runoff and soil loss from short and long slopes. ? We evaluate soil and water loss caused by storms of various frequency. ? We test the validity of S factors estimated by USLE/RUSLE. ? We assess effectiveness of conservation practices in reducing erosion. Abstract Study region Semi-arid hilly loess region of China. Study focus The objectives of this study were to investigate soil and water loss on agricultural sloping lands and to evaluate the effectiveness of soil conservation practices in controlling erosion using plot data. Runoff and soil loss were measured from the short slope plots (SSP) (7m long) and the long slope plots (LSP) (20m long) at various slope angles as well as from cropland and soil conservation plots (SCP) under natural rainfalls. New hydrological insights for the region The results revealed that runoff per unit area slightly increased with slope angle on SSP, but reached a maximum at 15° and then decreased with slope angle on LSP. Soil loss per unit area increased with slope angle on both SSP and LSP. An average of 36.4% less runoff but only 3.6% less soil loss per unit area was produced on LSP than on SSP. The S factor calculated using the slope factor equations in USLE/RUSLE was significantly greater than that estimated from the measured soil loss on the plots. Rainstorms with recurrence intervals greater than 2 years were responsible for more than two thirds of the total soil and water loss. The effectiveness in reducing surface runoff by five types of conservation practices was mixed. However, all the conservation practices yielded much less soil loss than cropland.
机译:强调 ?我们检查坡度最大为30°的径流和土壤流失。 ?我们比较了短坡和长坡的径流和土壤流失。 ?我们评估了由各种频率的风暴引起的水土流失。 ?我们测试由USLE / RUSLE估计的S因子的有效性。 ?我们评估了保护措施在减少侵蚀方面的有效性。摘要研究区域中国半干旱黄土丘陵区。研究重点本研究的目的是调查农业坡地的水土流失,并使用样地数据评估土壤保护措施在控制侵蚀方面的有效性。从不同坡度的短坡度图(SSP)(长7m)和长坡度图(LSP)(20m长)以及天然降雨下的农田和水土保持区(SCP)测量了径流和土壤流失。该地区的新水文见解结果表明,单位面积径流量在SSP上随倾斜角而略有增加,但在15°时达到最大值,然后在LSP上随倾斜角而减小。在SSP和LSP上,单位面积的土壤流失都随倾斜角的增加而增加。与SSP相比,LSP平均减少了36.4%的径流,但每单位面积的土壤流失仅减少了3.6%。使用USLE / RUSLE中的斜率因子方程式计算的S因子显着大于根据地块上测得的土壤流失估计的S因子。复发间隔大于2年的暴雨造成的水土流失总量占三分之二以上。五种养护方式在减少地表径流方面的效果好坏参半。但是,所有保护措施所产生的水土流失要比农田少得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号