...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Health Sciences >Hand Grip Strength in Elderly Patients with Chronic Illnesses: A Case Control Study
【24h】

Hand Grip Strength in Elderly Patients with Chronic Illnesses: A Case Control Study

机译:老年慢性疾病患者的手握力强度:病例对照研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Weak Handgrip Strength (HGS) is associated with poor functional performance capacity and frailty especially among older adults. This study compared HGS among elderly individuals with chronic illnesses and healthy controls. Methods: 176 (88 patients and 88 healthy controls) participants were purposively recruited for this case-control study. World Health Organization’s definition of old adult (i.e. 65 years and older) was adopted for the inclusion criteria. A handheld dynamometer was used to assess HGS. Anthropometric parameters were measured following standard procedures. Clinical bio-data of the patients were gleaned from case notes. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Alpha level was set at p<0.05. Results: The participants’ ages ranged between 65 and 84 years. The patient group had significant higher anthropometric measures (p<0.05). The controls had higher Dominant HGS (DHGS) (22.8 ± 7.12 vs. 26.5 ± 4.76 Kgf; p=0.001) and Non-Dominant HGS (NDHGS) (22.0 ± 6.21 vs. 25.4 ± 4.65 Kgf; p=0.00) respectively. The control group ‘males’ had significantly higher DHGS and NDHGS (p<0.05) while the patients’ group females had the least DHGS and NDHGS scores (p<0.05). Patients with neuromuscular conditions or multimorbidity had significantly lower DHGS and NDHGS (p<0.05). There was significant association between level of HGS and each of sex, age group and BMI classification (p<0.05). There were higher number of participants with weak and intermediate HGS in the patient group compared with controls (p=0.001). Regression analysis revealed that age, weight, height, BMI and duration of illness were significant predictors of DHGS and NDHGS respectively (p<0.05). The variability of the predictive model for DHGS and NDHGS was 37.7% and 52.2% respectively. (R~(2) =52.2). Similarly, only ‘age (p=0.011) and ‘duration of illness (p=0.001) were significant predictors of dominant HGS. Conclusions: Elderly individuals with chronic illnesses have poorer HGS than healthy controls. Having a neuromuscular conditions or multimorbidity significantly impaired HGS than illnesses of musculoskeletal origin. Age, gender and anthropometric measures significantly influence HGS. Age, weight, height, BMI and duration of illness seems to be moderate predictors of HGS but not without significant errors.
机译:背景:握力不足(HGS)与较差的功能表现能力和虚弱感相关,尤其是在老年人中。这项研究比较了患有慢性疾病和健康对照的老年人中的HGS。方法:有针对性地招募了176名患者(88名患者和88名健康对照)参加该病例对照研究。纳入标准采用了世界卫生组织对成年人(即65岁及65岁以上)的定义。手持式测功机用于评估HGS。按照标准程序测量人体测量学参数。从病例记录中收集患者的临床生物学数据。使用描述性和推断性统计数据分析数据。 α水平设定为p <0.05。结果:参与者的年龄介于65至84岁之间。病人组的人体测量指标较高(p <0.05)。对照具有较高的显性HGS(DHGS)(22.8±7.12 vs. 26.5±4.76 Kgf; p = 0.001)和非显性HGS(NDHGS)(22.0±6.21 vs. 25.4±4.65 Kgf; p = 0.00)。对照组“男性”的DHGS和NDHGS明显更高(p <0.05),而患者组的女性DHGS和NDHGS得分最低(p <0.05)。神经肌肉疾病或多发病的患者的DHGS和NDHGS明显降低(p <0.05)。 HGS水平与性别,年龄组和BMI分类之间均存在显着相关性(p <0.05)。与对照组相比,患者组中具有较弱和中等水平HGS的参与者数量更高(p = 0.001)。回归分析显示,年龄,体重,身高,BMI和疾病持续时间分别是DHGS和NDHGS的重要预测指标(p <0.05)。 DHGS和NDHGS预测模型的变异性分别为37.7%和52.2%。 (R〜(2)= 52.2)。同样,只有“年龄(p = 0.011)”和“疾病持续时间(p = 0.001)”是显性HGS的重要预测因子。结论:患有慢性疾病的老年人的HGS比健康对照者差。与肌肉骨骼起源的疾病相比,患有神经肌肉疾病或多发病的人明显损害了HGS。年龄,性别和人体测量学指标显着影响HGS。年龄,体重,身高,BMI和疾病持续时间似乎是HGS的中等预测指标,但并非没有重大错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号