...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology >The Difference in Mass between Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, Also Novel Effects of the Axial Doppler Shift
【24h】

The Difference in Mass between Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, Also Novel Effects of the Axial Doppler Shift

机译:相对论与量子力学之间的质量差异,也是轴向多普勒频移的新影响

获取原文
           

摘要

If a particle has a wave function or is in other ways a moving wave, it should have an axial Doppler shift. Writers on relativity do not give moving particles that. The classic equation of quantum mechanics requires that frequency and mass have the same distortion from velocity (Doppler shift). But in the common writings on relativity mass always goes up with increases of velocity, and the transverse shift of frequency always goes down with increases of velocity [1] [2] [3] [4]. Most of this is due to simplifications and errors in the Lorentz transformation, some came from being in the aether wind era originally and because accelerators are noisy. It is not valid to say because the aether axial wind averages to zero between reflections so does axial Doppler shifts. After the first reflection in the Lorentz transformation, the light from the Sun is in Earth’s reference frame and there are no more Doppler shifts. Also the Michelson-Morley experiment is not all cases, and light is not the only thing deformed by velocity. The axial shift’s formula has the cosine of the observation angle in it. The implications are not just quantitative but also qualitative because anything with an axial Doppler shift has different values in different directions from an observer. That is the defining property of a vector and that changes its dimensions and the dimensions of the differential relations it is in. This happens with other scalar qualities as well. That means scalars such as mass and charge are now vectors and have additional dimensions. Therefore differential equations with them have additional dimensions. This includes Faraday-Max- well’s equations and Schrodinger’s equations. Also the Doppler blue shift seems to imply additional dimensions of time another way. That is the first Lorentz transformation error; the second is assumption of non-existent symmetry.
机译:如果粒子具有波函数或以其他方式成为移动波,则它应具有轴向多普勒频移。相对论的作家们并没有给出那种运动的粒子。量子力学的经典方程式要求频率和质量具有相同的速度失真(多普勒频移)。但是在相对论的一般著作中,质量总是随着速度的增加而上升,而频率的横向偏移总是随着速度的增加而下降[1] [2] [3] [4]。这主要是由于洛伦兹(Lorentz)转换的简化和错误所致,其中一些源于最初处于以太风时代,并且加速器嘈杂。不能说是因为在反射之间以太轴向风平均为零,所以轴向多普勒频移也是如此。在洛伦兹变换中进行第一次反射之后,来自太阳的光进入地球的参考系,并且不再发生多普勒频移。而且,迈克尔逊-莫利实验并非所有情况,光不是唯一因速度而变形的事物。轴向位移的公式中包含观察角的余弦。其含义不仅是定量的,而且是定性的,因为具有轴向多普勒频移的任何事物在观察者的不同方向上具有不同的值。这是向量的定义属性,并且会改变其维数以及它所处的微分关系的维数。这也与其他标量性质一起发生。这意味着诸如质量和电荷之类的标量现在是矢量,并且具有附加维。因此,带有它们的微分方程具有附加的维数。其中包括法拉第-麦克斯韦方程式和薛定inger方程式。多普勒蓝移似乎也暗示着时间的其他维度。那是第一个洛伦兹变换错误;第二个假设是不存在对称性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号