...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research >The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion
【24h】

The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion

机译:与用于测量第一first趾关节背屈的传统测角仪相比,智能手机测角仪应用的可靠性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Adequate sagittal plane motion of the first metatarsalphalangeal joint (1st MTPJ) is important during normal gait and goniometric measurement is commonly used as a diagnostic and outcome assessment tool. We aimed to determine the intra and inter-rater reliability together with the concurrent validity of a universal plastic goniometer (UG) and a smartphone applicationlication (Dr G) for the measurement of dorsiflexion at the 1st MTPJ. Methods Measurement of joint position and passive range of motion of the 1st MTPJ dorsiflexion was compared using a UG and DrG goniometer. A double-blind repeated measures design was utilized, with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) used to determine levels of reliability. Results For joint position good intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.861) and good inter-rater reliability (ICC >0.823) was noted. However, the Dr G application consistently measured lower angles (mean 27.8° (SD 8.37)) than the UG (mean 32° (SD 11.7)) and these associations were significant (r?=?0.399, p?0.809). Inter-rater reliability was moderate to good for the UG (ICC 0.693 (95 % CI 0.580 to 0.788)) and good for the Dr G application (ICC 0.708 (95 % CI 0.597 to 0.799)). Conclusions Moderate to high intra and inter-rater reliability of joint position and passive 1st MTPJ motion can be achieved with traditional and smartphone-based goniometric measurement. The Dr G application may provide a slightly higher reliability, but devices should not be used inter-changeably as significant variation in measurement between devices may occur.
机译:背景技术在正常步态中,第一meta趾关节(第1 MTPJ)的充分矢状平面运动很重要,通常将测角法用作诊断和结果评估工具。我们旨在确定通用塑料测角仪(UG)和智能手机应用程序(Dr G)在第一个MTPJ背屈测量中的内部和评估者可靠性以及同时有效性。方法使用UG和DrG测角仪比较第一MTPJ背屈的关节位置和被动运动范围。利用双盲重复测量设计,并使用类内相关系数(ICC)确定可靠性水平。结果对于关节位置,观察者具有良好的评估者内部可靠性(ICC> 0.861)和评估者之间的良好可靠性(ICC> 0.823)。但是,Dr G的应用始终测量到比UG(平均32°(SD 11.7))更低的角度(平均27.8°(SD 8.37)),并且这些相关性很显着(r = 0.399,p = 0.809)。对于UG(ICC为0.693(95%CI 0.580至0.788)),评估者间的可靠性中等至良好,而对于Dr G应用为良好(ICC 0.708(95%CI 0.597至0.799))。结论传统的和基于智能手机的测角仪测量可以实现关节位置和被动的第一MTPJ运动的中等到高度的内部和内部评估者可靠性。 Dr G应用程序可能会提供更高的可靠性,但是不应互换使用设备,因为设备之间的测量可能会发生重大变化。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号