...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine >Book Review: On Fact and Fraud: Cautionary Tales From the Front Lines of Science:
【24h】

Book Review: On Fact and Fraud: Cautionary Tales From the Front Lines of Science:

机译:书评:关于事实与欺诈:科学前沿的警示故事:

获取原文
           

摘要

Unfortunately, science has too often been characterized as antagonistic to the field of complementary and alternative medicine.1–3 In reality, the scientific method does not take sides but is merely a means to understand nature. In the biomedical arena, scientific methodology has contributed to increased longevity and improved health (and therefore better quality of life) for millions of people throughout the world. Instead, what should be considered the enemy (and, thus, the focus of concern) in all health care areas is the corrupt and fraudulent use of scientific methods to advance personal agendas for power, money, and influence.4–9 Goodstein has produced a short readable text that details the difference between proper science and fraud. Admittedly, his examples tend to be from his own experience as a physicist at the California Institute of Technology. However, the rules of science are the same no matter what field, and Goodstein provides an excellent analysis of good versus bad science. Goodstein points out the fallacy of the idea of the 20th-century philosopher Karl Popper that falsifiability is a mandatory step in science (a thought echoed by Albert Einstein: “No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong”). While falsifiability is a philosophically satisfying notion, it is unworkable in practical terms, since no researcher will likely be successful in applying for grant funding merely to repeat another investigator’s experiment.10 Goodstein even describes his own personal experience of devoting time and efforts to disproving claims, with both his work and the original theory now having long been forgotten. Thus, as Goodstein shows throughout the text, science is predicated on ethical behavior by its practitioners. This book should be read by anyone concerned with the plethora of fraudulent, unethical, and dangerous pseudoscientific ideas being circulated in print and through a various media (including the Internet). Goodstein’s analysis is particularly important for those concerned about fraud in health care fields, where lives are at stake.
机译:不幸的是,科学常常被描述为对补充医学和替代医学领域的反对者。1–3实际上,科学方法并不具有优势,而仅仅是理解自然的一种手段。在生物医学领域,科学方法已为全世界数百万人增加了寿命并改善了健康状况(从而改善了生活质量)。取而代之的是,在所有医疗保健领域中,应该被视为敌人(并因此成为关注焦点)的是腐败和欺诈性地使用科学方法来推进个人关于权力,金钱和影响力的议程。4-9古德斯坦已经产生简短易读的文字,详细说明了科学与欺诈之间的区别。不可否认,他的例子往往来自于他自己在加州理工学院的物理学家的经验。但是,无论在哪个领域,科学规则都是相同的,古德斯坦(Goodstein)提供了对好科学与坏科学的出色分析。古德斯坦指出了20世纪哲学家卡尔·波普尔(Karl Popper)的谬论,即可证伪性是科学中必不可少的步骤(阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦的观点是:“没有多少实验能证明我是对的;一次实验就能证明我是对的。 ”)。虽然可证伪性是一个哲学上令人满意的概念,但在实践上是行不通的,因为没有研究人员可能仅为了重复另一位研究者的实验就能够成功申请赠款10。古德斯坦甚至描述了他自己的个人经验,他们花费了很多时间和精力来反驳主张。 ,如今他的作品和原始理论早已被人们遗忘。因此,正如古德斯坦在整篇文章中所展示的那样,科学是由实践者以道德行为为基础的。任何与印刷和通过各种媒体(包括互联网)传播的大量欺诈性,不道德和危险的伪科学思想有关的人都应该阅读这本书。对于那些担心生命危险的医疗领域的欺诈行为,古德斯坦的分析尤为重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号