...
首页> 外文期刊>Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra >Evaluation of Activities of Daily Living/Instrumental Activities of Daily Living to Accurately Determine Severity of Moderate and Severe Alzheimer’s Disease: Comparison of Assessments by Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve and Discriminant Analyses
【24h】

Evaluation of Activities of Daily Living/Instrumental Activities of Daily Living to Accurately Determine Severity of Moderate and Severe Alzheimer’s Disease: Comparison of Assessments by Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve and Discriminant Analyses

机译:准确评估中度和重度阿尔茨海默氏病严重程度的日常生活活动/器具活动的评估:通过接收者工作特征曲线和判别分析进行评估的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine Activities of Daily Living/Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL/IADL) evaluations that will enable better understanding of the severity of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Methods: AD patients were evaluated by Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Hyogo Activities of Daily Living Scale (HADLS), and Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) to identify the assessments that will enable highly precise discrimination of AD Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) 2 (moderate) and CDR3 (severe) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and discriminant analyses. Results: The participants were 75 AD patients (CDR2 = 50, mean age = 80.3 ± 5.9 years; CDR3 = 25, mean age = 78.3 ± 9.0 years). The evaluation methods consisted of FIM, HADLS, and AMPS. The results were divided into FIM-M, FIM-C, HADLS-ADL, HADLS-IADL, AMPS-motor skills, and AMPS-process skills. The values for the area under the curve (AUC) were compared by ROC curve and discriminant analyses. AUC values for FIM-C and AMPS-process skills were 0.956 and 0.947, respectively. With these two evaluations only, values ≥0.9 were shown. Moreover, the AUC of the discrimination score (combination of the FIM-C and AMPS-process skills) was significantly higher than those for FIM-M, FIM-C, HADLS-ADL, HADLS-IADL, and AMPS-motor skills. Conclusions: The results demonstrated that evaluation by FIM-C and AMPS-process skills methods was useful for discriminating between CDR2 (moderate) and CDR3 (severe) AD. Moreover, the results indicated that these two evaluation methods enabled more accurate determination of severity and the spared capabilities of AD patients.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是确定日常生活活动/日常生活中的仪器活动(ADL / IADL)评估,以便更好地了解阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)的严重程度。方法:通过功能独立性量度(FIM),兵库县日常生活活动量表(HADLS)和运动和过程技能评估(AMPS)对AD患者进行评估,以鉴定能够对AD临床痴呆症评分进行高度精确区分的评估( CDR)2(中等)和CDR3(严重)使用接收器工作特征(ROC)曲线和判别分析。结果:参与者为75名AD患者(CDR2 = 50,平均年龄= 80.3±5.9岁; CDR3 = 25,平均年龄= 78.3±9.0岁)。评估方法包括FIM,HADLS和AMPS。结果分为FIM-M,FIM-C,HADLS-ADL,HADLS-IADL,AMPS运动技能和AMPS处理技能。通过ROC曲线和判别分析比较曲线下面积(AUC)的值。 FIM-C和AMPS处理技能的AUC值分别为0.956和0.947。仅通过这两个评估,显示值≥0.9。此外,歧视分数的AUC(FIM-C和AMPS处理技能的结合)显着高于FIM-M,FIM-C,HADLS-ADL,HADLS-IADL和AMPS运动技能的AUC。结论:结果表明,通过FIM-C和AMPS加工技能方法进行的评估有助于区分CDR2(中度)和CDR3(严重)AD。而且,结果表明,这两种评估方法能够更准确地确定AD患者的严重程度和剩余能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号