首页> 外文期刊>Journal of diabetes investigation. >Identification and comparison of insulin pharmacokinetics injected with a new 4‐mm needle vs 6‐ and 8‐mm needles accounting for endogenous insulin and C‐peptide secretion kinetics in non‐diabetic adult males
【24h】

Identification and comparison of insulin pharmacokinetics injected with a new 4‐mm needle vs 6‐ and 8‐mm needles accounting for endogenous insulin and C‐peptide secretion kinetics in non‐diabetic adult males

机译:鉴定和比较注射新的4毫米针头与6毫米和8毫米针头的胰岛素药代动力学,从而说明了非糖尿病成年男性的内源性胰岛素和C肽分泌动力学

获取原文
           

摘要

AbstractAims/IntroductionMany patients with diabetes now use 5-, 6- or 8-mm needles for insulin injection. However, it is unclear whether needle length, particularly for shorter needles, affects the pharmacokinetic properties of insulin.Materials and MethodsThis was a three-way, randomized, cross-over, single-center study involving 12 healthy Japanese adult males (age 27.4 ± 4.14 years; weight 64.2 ± 5.2 kg; body fat percentage 18.2 ± 1.5%). Participants received a subcutaneous (abdomen) dose of insulin lispro (1.5 U for participants weighing 55 to 65.0 kg; 2.0 U for participants weighing 65.0 to 80.0 kg) delivered using a 32-G × 4 mm (32G × 4), 31-G × 8 mm (31G × 8) or 32-G × 6 mm (32G × 6) needle with a 3–7-day washout between doses. Pharmacokinetic parameters of exogenous insulin were identified using non-linear least squares, where the total insulin concentration was fit to the measured plasma insulin concentration using an overall combined model that accounted for C-peptide/insulin secretion in addition to the injected dose.ResultsMaximum concentration and area under the curve for 0 to infinity min for insulin were bioequivalent for the 32G × 4 needle relative to the 32G × 6 and the 31G × 8 needles. The time to the maximum insulin concentration was bioequivalent for the 32G × 4 needle relative to the 32G × 6 needle, but not the 31G × 8 needle.ConclusionsThe use of 4-mm needles is unlikely to change the pharmacokinetic properties of insulin when injected subcutaneously in adults. This trial was registered with UMIN-CTR (no. UMIN000004469).
机译:摘要目的/简介许多糖尿病患者现在使用5毫米,6毫米或8毫米针头进行胰岛素注射。然而,目前尚不清楚针头的长度(特别是短针)是否会影响胰岛素的药代动力学特性。材料与方法这是一项三方,随机,交叉,单中心研究,涉及12名日本健康成年男性(27.4岁) 4.14年;体重64.2±5.2千克;体脂百分比18.2±1.5%)。参与者接受皮下(腹部)剂量的赖脯胰岛素(对于体重55至<65.0公斤的参与者为1.5 U;对于体重65.0至<80.0公斤的参与者为2.0 U),使用32-G×4 mm(32G×4),31 -G×8毫米(31G×8)或32-G×6毫米(32G×6)针,两次之间的冲洗时间为3-7天。使用非线性最小二乘法确定外源胰岛素的药代动力学参数,其中总胰岛素浓度与所测血浆胰岛素浓度相符(使用整体组合模型,该模型除注射剂量外还考虑了C肽/胰岛素分泌)。相对于32G×6和31G×8针,胰岛素从0到无限远的曲线下面积和胰岛素的生物等效性为32G×4针。相对于32G×6针,达到32G×4针的最大胰岛素浓度的时间是生物等效的,但31G×8针则没有。等效于使用皮下注射的4-mm针不太可能改变胰岛素的药代动力学特性。在成人中。该试验已在UMIN-CTR(编号UMIN000004469)中注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号