...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Oral Science >Effect of light curing unit on resin-modified glass-ionomer cements: a microhardness assessment
【24h】

Effect of light curing unit on resin-modified glass-ionomer cements: a microhardness assessment

机译:光固化单元对树脂改性的玻璃离子水门汀的影响:显微硬度评估

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the microhardness of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (RMGICs) photoactivated with a blue light-emitting diode (LED) curing light. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty specimens were distributed in 3 groups: Fuji II LC Improved/GC (RM1), Vitremer/3M ESPE (RM2) and Filtek Z250/ 3M ESPE (RM3). Two commercial light-curing units were used to polymerize the materials: LED/Ultrablue IS and a halogen light/XL3000 (QTH). After 24 h, Knoop microhardness test was performed. Data were submitted to three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at a pre-set alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: At the top surface, no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) in the microhardness was seen when the LED and QTH lights were used for all materials. At the bottom surface, microhardness mean value of RM2 was significantly higher when the QTH light was used (p<0.05). For RM1, statistically significant higher values (p<0.05) were seen when the LED light was used. No statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was seen at the bottom surface for RM3, irrespective of the light used. Top-to-bottom surface comparison showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) for both RMGICs, regardless of the light used. For RM3, microhardness mean value at the top was significantly higher (p<0.05) than bottom microhardness when both curing units were used. CONCLUSION: The microhardness values seen when a LED light was used varied depending on the restorative material tested.
机译:目的:评价用蓝色发光二极管(LED)光活化的树脂改性玻璃离聚物水泥(RMGIC)的显微硬度。材料与方法:30个标本分为3组:Fuji II LC改良型/ GC(RM1),Vitremer / 3M ESPE(RM2)和Filtek Z250 / 3M ESPE(RM3)。两个商业光固化装置用于聚合材料:LED / Ultrablue IS和卤素灯/ XL3000(QTH)。 24小时后,进行努氏显微硬度测试。数据以0.05的预设alpha值进行了三项ANOVA和Tukey检验。结果:当所有材料都使用LED和QTH灯时,在显微硬度上没有发现统计学上的显着差异(p> 0.05)。在底表面,当使用QTH光时,RM2的显微硬度平均值显着更高(p <0.05)。对于RM1,使用LED灯时,在统计学上具有较高的显着值(p <0.05)。不论使用何种光,RM3的底面均未见统计学上的显着差异(p> 0.05)。从上到下的表面比较显示,无论使用哪种光,两种RMGIC均无统计学上的显着差异(p> 0.05)。对于RM3,当使用两个固化单元时,顶部的显微硬度平均值明显高于底部的显微硬度(p <0.05)。结论:使用LED灯时看到的显微硬度值随所测试的修复材料的不同而不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号