...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques >Central Giant Cell Granuloma of the Jaws: Correlation between Vascularity and Biologic Behavior
【24h】

Central Giant Cell Granuloma of the Jaws: Correlation between Vascularity and Biologic Behavior

机译:下颌中央巨细胞肉芽肿:血管与生物学行为之间的相关性。

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Giant cell lesions of the bone comprise a group of jaw bone pathologies. Different pathogeneses such as reactive, vascular or neoplastic have been proposed for these lesions. In addition, differentiating between aggressive and nonaggressive central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws based on histopathologic features is still impossible and due to different treatment protocols for the two groups, correct diagnosis is necessary. The purpose of this study was to compare the expression of CD34 between aggressive and nonaggressive CGCGs of the jaws. Methods & Materials: This retrospective study was carried out on 16 paraffin blocks in each aggressive and nonaggressive CGCGs group. The expression of CD34 was evaluated with immunohistochemical technique. Afterwards, t-test was used for quantitative evaluation and comparison of CD34 expression among the two groups. Eventually, statistical analysis was performed using Spss20 software. Significance was assigned at p < 0.05. Results: In the present study, the average age of patients in aggressive and nonaggressive groups was 20.93±8.08 and 26.18±16.97, respectively. In both groups, female predilection was observed. Mandible was the most common site of involvement in the aggressive group and the distribution of nonaggressive lesions was equal between both jaws. Although the expression of CD34 in the aggressive group was higher than the nonaggressive group, no statistically significant difference was seen (p=0.15). Conclusion: According to the results of the current study, it appears that CD34 protein cannot be used for identifying the clinical behavior of CGCGs.
机译:简介:骨骼的巨大细胞病变包括一组颌骨病变。已经针对这些病变提出了不同的病原体,例如反应性,血管性或赘生性。此外,根据组织病理学特征区分颌骨侵袭性和非侵袭性中央巨细胞肉芽肿(CGCG)仍然是不可能的,并且由于两组的治疗方案不同,因此必须进行正确的诊断。这项研究的目的是比较侵略性和非侵略性颌骨CGCG之间CD34的表达。方法和材料:这项回顾性研究是在每个攻击性和非攻击性CGCGs组中对16种石蜡块进行的。用免疫组化技术评价CD34的表达。之后,使用t检验对两组中的CD34表达进行定量评估和比较。最终,使用Spss20软件进行了统计分析。显着性指定为p <0.05。结果:在本研究中,积极组和非积极组患者的平均年龄分别为20.93±8.08和26.18±16.97。两组均观察到女性偏爱。下颌骨是侵略性组中最常见的受累部位,非侵袭性病变的分布在两个颚之间相等。尽管攻击性组的CD34表达高于非攻击性组,但未见统计学上的显着差异(p = 0.15)。结论:根据目前的研究结果,似乎CD34蛋白不能用于鉴定CGCG的临床行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号