...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Dental Sciences >The impact of different DNA extraction methods on the analysis of microbial diversity of oral saliva from healthy youths by polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
【24h】

The impact of different DNA extraction methods on the analysis of microbial diversity of oral saliva from healthy youths by polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis

机译:聚合酶链反应-变性梯度凝胶电泳分析不同DNA提取方法对健康青年口腔唾液微生物多样性的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background/purpose Polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE), as a conventional molecular technique, was utilized to analyze the diversity of oral microbiota. However, studies found that the results of PCR-DGGE were affected by the DNA isolation method. This study compared QIAamp DNA Micro Kit extraction method with the phenol and chloroform extraction method for DNA isolation of saliva of healthy youths and analyzed PCR-DGGE fingerprints. Materials and methods In the first stage, samples were divided into two after collection from eight health youths. Two methods were used to isolate the DNA for PCR-DGGE analysis. In the second stage, another 16 samples were collected from 14 youths. The better method, QIAamp DNA Micro Kit, was used to isolate the DNA for PCR-DGGE analysis. The cluster analysis was performed with unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic means. Results The results in the first stage showed that the QIAamp DNA Micro Kit extraction method was more suitable for DNA extraction of saliva than the phenol-chloroform extraction method. In the second stage, the bands were changed into numbers “0”, “1”, and “2” to analyze the similarity of samples according to the bands' lightness. The similarity indices of different periods from the same individual showed that the microbiological composition was very similar (0.95), while those from different individuals varied greatly (0.90). Conclusion PCR-DGGE was more accurate in assessing oral microbial diversity by QIAamp DNA Micro Kit. Different individuals had large differences in oral microbial diversity but also had some common microbial dominant communities.
机译:背景/目的聚合酶链反应-变性梯度凝胶电泳(PCR-DGGE),作为一种常规分子技术,被用于分析口腔微生物群的多样性。然而,研究发现PCR-DGGE的结果受DNA分离方法的影响。本研究比较了QIAamp DNA Micro Kit提取方法与苯酚和氯仿提取方法对健康青年唾液的DNA分离,并分析了PCR-DGGE指纹。材料和方法在第一阶段,从八名健康青年中收集样本后将其分为两部分。使用两种方法来分离用于PCR-DGGE分析的DNA。在第二阶段,又从14名青年中收集了16个样本。使用更好的方法QIAamp DNA Micro Kit分离DNA进行PCR-DGGE分析。聚类分析采用算术均数的非加权成对分组法进行。结果第一阶段的结果表明,QIAamp DNA Micro Kit提取方法比酚-氯仿提取方法更适合唾液的DNA提取。在第二阶段,将条带更改为数字“ 0”,“ 1”和“ 2”,以根据条带的亮度分析样本的相似性。同一个体不同时期的相似性指数表明,微生物组成非常相似(> 0.95),而不同个体的微生物组成差异很大(<0.90)。结论通过QIAamp DNA Micro Kit,PCR-DGGE能更准确地评估口腔微生物的多样性。不同个体的口腔微生物多样性差异很大,但也有一些共同的微生物优势群落。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号