首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Case Reports >Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Intrathecal Fentanyl, Clonidine and Fentanyl-Clonidine Combination as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine for Infra-Umblical Surgery
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Intrathecal Fentanyl, Clonidine and Fentanyl-Clonidine Combination as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine for Infra-Umblical Surgery

机译:鞘内注射芬太尼,可乐定和芬太尼-可乐定联合作为布比卡因佐剂在下颌手术中的疗效比较评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of sensory block, onset and duration of motor block, post-operative analgesia, and adverse effects of combination of clonidine and fentanyl given intra-thecally with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Material and Methods: Ninety patients were randomized into three groups of group BC (n=30):? hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine, clonidine, and 0.9% NaCl intra-thecally; group BF (n=30): hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine, fentanyl, and 0.9% NaCl intra-thecally; group BFC (n=30):? hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.3 ml of clonidine, and fentanyl intra-thecally. Results: Either adjuvant, fentanyl or clonidine when added to intra-thecal bupivacaine prolongs the motor block and decreases the requirement of rescue analgesic in 24 hours but time to first rescue analgesic request is more prolonged in clonidine as compared to fentanyl. Clonidine is superior to fentanyl in prolonging the sensory block. Combination of intra-thecal fentanyl and clonidine as compared to fentanyl alone, as adjuvant to bupivacaine, is superior in prolonging the sensory block, motor block and time to first rescue analgesic request. Combination of intra-thecal fentanyl and clonidine as compared to clonidine alone, as adjuvant to bupivacaine, produces similar sensory block but is superior in prolonging the motor block and time to first rescue analgesic request. Conclusion: The combination of fentanyl and clonidine, as adjuvant to intra-thecal bupivacaine, is superior for surgical procedures of long duration and those procedures which mandate muscle relaxation.?
机译:背景:本研究的目的是评估鞘膜内给予高压布比卡因与可乐定和芬太尼合用时的感觉阻滞水平,运动阻滞的发作和持续时间,术后镇痛以及不良反应。材料和方法:将90例患者随机分为三组,即BC组(n = 30):?鞘内高压0.5%布比卡因,可乐定和0.9%NaCl; BF组(n = 30):鞘内高压0.5%布比卡因,芬太尼和0.9%NaCl。 BFC组(n = 30):?高压0.5%布比卡因,0.3 ml可乐定和鞘内芬太尼。结果:鞘内注射布比卡因中加入佐剂,芬太尼或可乐定均可延长运动阻滞,并在24小时内降低急救镇痛的要求,但可乐定与芬太尼相比,首次急救镇痛的时间更长。可乐定在延长感觉阻滞方面优于芬太尼。与单独使用芬太尼相比,鞘内使用芬太尼和可乐定的组合作为布比卡因的佐剂,在延长感觉阻滞,运动阻滞和首次抢救止痛药的时间方面具有优势。与布比卡因的佐剂相比,鞘内使用芬太尼和可乐定的组合与单独使用可乐定的组合产生相似的感觉阻滞,但在延长运动阻滞和首次抢救镇痛要求的时间方面具有优势。结论:芬太尼和可乐定的组合作为鞘内注射布比卡因的佐剂,对于长时间的外科手术和要求肌肉放松的手术而言,效果更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号