...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business & Financial Affairs >Ethics in Employee Selection: What You Want to Know but are Afraid to Ask
【24h】

Ethics in Employee Selection: What You Want to Know but are Afraid to Ask

机译:员工甄选中的道德规范:您想知道但不敢问的问题

获取原文
           

摘要

Despite the fact that diversity management in the workplace has been regulated by equal employment opportunity legislation for decades, the topic of ethics in employee selection has not been widely examined. It can be argued that most managers’ modus operandi considers what is legal the same as what is ethical. This narrow mindset coupled with the dominant utilitarian view in decision making may explain why corporate managers around the world are conflicted when it comes to making ethical hiring decisions. For example, according to a recent survey of college graduates with incomes in the top quarter of their occupational group, forty-three percent of British respondents, fifty-six percent of Americans and sixty percent of Swedes continue to agree with Milton Friedman's classic 1970 [1] assertion “the social responsibility of business is to increase its profit” [2]. Given such survey results, it is not surprising to see that in order to satisfy multiple corporate stakeholders, managers are prone to making decisions that may be legal (i.e., hiring based on merit), but not ethical (i.e., poaching talent from competitors, making it an unfair hiring practice).
机译:尽管几十年来,平等工作机会立法一直在规范工作场所的多样性管理,但员工选拔中的道德主题尚未得到广泛研究。可以说,大多数经理的作案手法认为合法与道德是相同的。这种狭窄的心态加上决策中占主导地位的功利主义观点,可以解释为什么在做出合乎道德的雇用决策时,全球的企业管理者会发生冲突。例如,根据最近对收入在其职业类别中前四分之一的大学毕业生的调查,英国受访者中有43%,美国人中有56%和瑞典人中60%仍然同意米尔顿·弗里德曼(Milton Friedman)的经典著作1970 [ 1]断言“企业的社会责任是增加利润” [2]。根据这样的调查结果,毫不奇怪的是,为了满足多个公司利益相关者的利益,经理们倾向于做出可能是合法的决定(例如,基于绩效聘用),但是不道德的决定(即,从竞争对手那里挖人,使其成为不公平的招聘行为)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号