首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research >Comparison of Risk Assessment for a Nuclear Power Plant Construction Project Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
【24h】

Comparison of Risk Assessment for a Nuclear Power Plant Construction Project Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

机译:基于层次分析法和模糊层次分析法的核电站建设项目风险评估比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Recently, plant construction throughout the world, including nuclear power plant construction, has grown significantly. The scale of Korea’s nuclear power plant construction in particular, has increased gradually since it won a contract for a nuclear power plant construction project in the United Arab Emirates in 2009. However, time and monetary resources have been lost in some nuclear power plant construction sites due to lack of risk management ability. The need to prevent losses at nuclear power plant construction sites has become more urgent because it demands professional skills and large-scale resources. Therefore, in this study, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) were applied in order to make comparisons between decision-making methods, to assess the potential risks at nuclear power plant construction sites. To suggest the appropriate choice between two decision-making methods, a survey was carried out. From the results, the importance and the priority of 24 risk factors, classified by process, cost, safety, and quality, were analyzed. The FAHP was identified as a suitable method for risk assessment of nuclear power plant construction, compared with risk assessment using the AHP. These risk factors will be able to serve as baseline data for risk management in nuclear power plant construction projects.
机译:最近,包括核电厂建设在内的全世界的电厂建设都在显着增长。自从2009年赢得阿拉伯联合酋长国的核电站建设项目合同以来,尤其是韩国的核电站建设规模逐渐增加。但是,一些核电站建设工地已经浪费了时间和金钱资源由于缺乏风险管理能力。防止在核电站建筑工地损失的需求变得更加迫切,因为它需要专业技能和大量资源。因此,在本研究中,应用层次分析法(AHP)和模糊层次分析法(FAHP)进行决策方法之间的比较,以评估核电厂建设现场的潜在风险。要提出两种决策方法之间的合适的选择,一调查进行。从结果中,分析了按过程,成本,安全性和质量分类的24个风险因素的重要性和优先级。与使用AHP进行风险评估相比,FAHP被认为是用于核电厂建设风险评估的合适方法。这些风险因素将能够用作核电站建设项目风险管理的基准数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号