首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology >Comparison of continuous epidural infusion of 0.125% ropivacaine with 1μg/ml fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine with 1μg/ml fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in major abdominal surgery
【24h】

Comparison of continuous epidural infusion of 0.125% ropivacaine with 1μg/ml fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine with 1μg/ml fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in major abdominal surgery

机译:硬膜外腔连续输注0.125%罗哌卡因联合1μg/ ml芬太尼与0.125%布比卡因联合1μg/ ml芬太尼用于大腹部手术后镇痛的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Aim: The present study was carried out to compare the efficacy of continuous epidural infusion of two amide local anesthetics, ropivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in major abdominal surgeries. Material and Methods: A total of 60 patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were randomized into two study Groups B and R with thirty patients in each group. All patients were administered general anesthesia after placing epidural catheter. Patients received continuous epidural infusion of either 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 ug/ml fentanyl (Group B) or of 0.25% ropivacaine with 1 ug/ml fentanyl (Group R) at the rate 6 ml/h intraoperatively. Postoperatively, they received 0.125% bupivacaine with 1 ug/ml fentanyl (Group B) or 0.125% ropivacaine with 1 ug/ml fentanyl (Group R) at the rate 6 ml/h. Hemodynamic parameters, visual analog scale (VAS), level of sensory block, and degree of motor block (based on Bromage scale) were monitored for 24 h postoperatively. Results: Hemodynamic parameters and VAS scores were comparable in the two groups. The level of sensory block was higher in bupivacaine group. There were more patients with higher Bromage score in the (23.3%) bupivacaine group than in (6.7%) ropivacaine group though the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Both ropivacaine and bupivacaine in the concentration of 0.125% with fentanyl 1 ug/ml are equally safe, with minimal motor block and are effective in providing postoperative analgesia.
机译:背景与目的:本研究旨在比较硬膜外连续输注两种酰胺类局部麻醉药罗哌卡因和布比卡因与芬太尼在大腹部手术中的镇痛效果。材料和方法:将计划进行腹部大手术的60例患者随机分为B组和R组两个研究组,每组30名患者。所有患者均在放置硬膜外导管后进行全身麻醉。患者在术中以6 ml / h的速度连续硬膜外输注0.25%布比卡因与1 ug / ml芬太尼(B组)或0.25%罗哌卡因与1 ug / ml芬太尼(R组)。术后,他们以6 ml / h的速率接受0.125%布比卡因和1 ug / ml芬太尼(B组)或0.125%罗哌卡因和1 ug / ml芬太尼(R组)。术后24小时监测血流动力学参数,视觉模拟量表(VAS),感觉阻滞水平和运动阻滞程度(基于Bromage量表)。结果:两组的血流动力学参数和VAS评分相当。布比卡因组感觉障碍水平较高。布比卡因组(23.3%)比罗哌卡因组(6.7%)有更高的Bromage评分患者,尽管差异无统计学意义。结论:罗非卡因和布比卡因浓度为0.125%的芬太尼1 ug / ml都是安全的,运动障碍最小,可有效提供术后镇痛作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号