...
首页> 外文期刊>Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia >Can the single-breath helium dilution method predict lung volumes as measured by whole-body plethysmography?
【24h】

Can the single-breath helium dilution method predict lung volumes as measured by whole-body plethysmography?

机译:单呼吸氦稀释法能否通过全身体积描记法预测肺体积?

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare TLC and RV values obtained by the single-breath helium dilution (SBHD) method with those obtained by whole-body plethysmography (WBP) in patients with normal lung function, patients with obstructive lung disease (OLD), and patients with restrictive lung disease (RLD), varying in severity, and to devise equations to estimate the SBHD results.METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study involving 169 individuals, of whom 93 and 49 presented with OLD and RLD, respectively, the remaining 27 having normal lung function. All patients underwent spirometry and lung volume measurement by both methods.RESULTS: TLC and RV were higher by WBP than by SBHD. The discrepancy between the methods was more pronounced in the OLD group, correlating with the severity of airflow obstruction. In the OLD group, the correlation coefficient of the comparison between the two methods was 0.57 and 0.56 for TLC and RV, respectively (p 0.001 for both). We used regression equations, adjusted for the groups studied, in order to predict the WBP values of TLC and RV, using the corresponding SBHD values. It was possible to create regression equations to predict differences in TLC and RV between the two methods only for the OLD group. The TLC and RV equations were, respectively, ∆TLCWBP-SBHD in L = 5.264 − 0.060 × FEV1/FVC (r2= 0.33; adjusted r2 = 0.32) and ∆RVWBP-SBHD in L = 4.862 − 0.055 × FEV1/FVC (r2= 0.31; adjusted r2 = 0.30).CONCLUSIONS: The correction of TLC and RV results obtained by SBHD can improve the accuracy of this method for assessing lung volumes in patients with OLD. However, additional studies are needed in order to validate these equations.
机译:目的:比较单呼吸氦稀释(SBHD)方法获得的TLC和RV值与全身体积描记法(WBP)获得的TLC和RV值,用于肺功能正常的患者,阻塞性肺疾病(OLD)和患有肺功能不全的患者方法:这是一项回顾性横断面研究,涉及169位个体,其中93位和49位分别表现出OLD和RLD,其余患者的严重程度各异,并设计方程式估算SBHD结果。 27肺功能正常。结果:WBP的TLC和RV均高于SBHD。在OLD组中,方法之间的差异更为明显,这与气流阻塞的严重程度相关。在OLD组中,TLC和RV两种方法之间比较的相关系数分别为0.57和0.56(两种方法的p <0.001)。我们使用针对所研究的组进行调整的回归方程,以便使用相应的SBHD值预测TLC和RV的WBP值。仅对于OLD组,可以创建回归方程来预测两种方法之间的TLC和RV差异。 TLC和RV方程分别为L = 5.264 − 0.060×FEV1 / FVC(r2 = 0.33;调整后的r2 = 0.32)的∆TLCWBP-SBHD和L = 4.862 − 0.055×FEV1 / FVC(r2的∆RVWBP-SBHD) = 0.31;调整后的r2 = 0.30)。结论:SBHD对TLC和RV结果的校正可以提高该方法评估OLD患者肺容量的准确性。但是,为了验证这些方程式,还需要进行其他研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号