首页> 外文期刊>Drug Design, Development and Therapy >A pharmacokinetic comparison of two voriconazole formulations and the effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on their pharmacokinetic profiles
【24h】

A pharmacokinetic comparison of two voriconazole formulations and the effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on their pharmacokinetic profiles

机译:两种伏立康唑制剂的药代动力学比较以及CYP2C19多态性对其药代动力学特征的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: SYP-1018 is a lyophilized polymeric nanoparticle formulation of voriconazole that is under development for intravenous dosing. This study compared the pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles of SYP-1018 with those of Vfend?, the marketed formulation of voriconazole. The effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on the voriconazole pharmacokinetics was also evaluated.? Methods: An open-label, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence crossover study was conducted in 52 healthy male volunteers, who randomly received a single intravenous infusion of either of the two voriconazole formulations at 200 mg. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after drug administration for pharmacokinetic analysis. The plasma concentrations of voriconazole were determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a noncompartmental method. CYP2C19 genotype was identified in 51 subjects.? Results: The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of SYP-1018 to Vfend? was 0.99 (0.93–1.04) for the maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) and 0.97 (0.92–1.01) for the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) from dosing to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast). Nineteen homozygous extensive metabolizers (EMs, *1/*1), 19 intermediate metabolizers (IMs, *1/*2 or *1/*3), and ten poor metabolizers (PMs, *2/*2, *2/*3, or *3/*3) were identified, and the pharmacokinetic comparability between SYP-1018 and Vfend? was also noted when analyzed separately by genotype. The systemic exposure to voriconazole was greatest in the PM group, followed by the IM, and then the EM groups. Furthermore, the intrasubject variability for Cmax and AUClast was greater in IMs and PMs than in EMs. No serious adverse event occurred, and both treatments were well tolerated.? Conclusion: SYP-1018 had comparable pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles to Vfend? after a single intravenous infusion. CYP2C19 genotype affected not only the pharmacokinetics of voriconazole, but its intrasubject variability. SYP-1018 can be further developed as a clinically effective alternative to Vfend?.
机译:目的:SYP-1018是伏立康唑的冻干聚合物纳米颗粒制剂,目前正在开发中,可用于静脉内给药。这项研究比较了SYP-1018和伏立康唑市售制剂Vfend?的药代动力学和耐受性。还评估了CYP2C19多态性对伏立康唑药代动力学的影响。方法:在52名健康男性志愿者中进行了一项开放标签,两种治疗,两个时期,两个序列的交叉研究,他们随机接受两种伏立康唑制剂的一次静脉输注,每次200 mg。给药后24小时内收集血样进行药代动力学分析。伏立康唑的血浆浓度是通过液相色谱-串联质谱法测定的,其药代动力学参数是通过非房室方法估算的。 CYP2C19基因型在51名受试者中被鉴定。结果:SYP-1018与Vfend的几何平均比(置信区间为90%)?从给药到最后可量化浓度(AUClast)的最大浓度(Cmax)为0.99(0.93-1.04),浓度-时间曲线(AUC)下的面积为0.97(0.92-1.01)。 19种纯合子广泛代谢者(EMs,* 1 / * 1),19种中度代谢者(IMs,* 1 / * 2或* 1 / * 3)和10种弱代谢者(PMs,* 2 / * 2,* 2 / * 3或* 3 / * 3),并且SYP-1018与Vfend之间的药代动力学可比性?当按基因型分别进行分析时,也应注意。 PM组的伏立康唑全身暴露量最大,其次是IM组,然后是EM组。此外,IM和PM中Cmax和AUClast的受试者内部变异性大于EM中。没有发生严重的不良事件,并且两种疗法的耐受性都很好。结论:SYP-1018的药代动力学和耐受性与Vfend?相当。单次静脉输注后。 CYP2C19基因型不仅影响伏立康唑的药代动力学,而且影响受试者体内的变异性。 SYP-1018可作为Vfend?的临床有效替代品进一步开发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号