首页> 外文期刊>Drug Design, Development and Therapy >Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for treating wet age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for treating wet age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:玻璃体腔内抗VEGF注射液治疗湿性老年性黄斑变性的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the main cause of blindness. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor is used to prevent further neovascularization due to wet AMD. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the effect and protocol of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment on wet AMD.Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and reference lists. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata12.0 software, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal thickness, and lesion size were evaluated.Results: Twelve randomized controlled trials spanning from 2010 to 2014 and involving 5,225 patients were included. A significant difference was observed between the intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) group and the intravitreal bevacizumab group (standard mean difference?=-0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] =-0.23 to -0.05). No significant differences were observed in best corrected VA, retinal thickness, or lesion size between IVR and the intravitreal aflibercept group. Compared to monthly injection, IVR as-needed injections (PRN) can raise VA by 1.97 letters (weighted mean difference =1.97, 95% CI =0.14–3.794). Combination therapy of IVR and photodynamic therapy can significantly raise VA by 2.74 letters when combined with IVR monotherapy (weighted mean difference =2.74, 95% CI =0.26–5.21).Conclusion: The superiority remains unclear between IVR and intravitreal bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular AMD. Intravitreal aflibercept dosed every 2 months required fewer injection times, but produced similar efficacy as monthly IVR. IVR PRN could significantly increase VA. Combined with photodynamic therapy, IVR therapy could also increase VA effectively.
机译:目的:年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)是失明的主要原因。抗血管内皮生长因子用于预防由于湿性AMD而引起的新血管形成。该系统评价的目的是研究抗血管内皮生长因子治疗湿性AMD的效果和方案。方法:在PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI和参考文献列表中进行全面的文献检索。使用Stata12.0软件进行荟萃分析,评估最佳矫正视力(BCVA),视网膜厚度和病变大小。结果:从2010年至2014年共进行了12项随机对照试验,涉及5,225例患者。玻璃体内雷珠单抗(IVR)组和玻璃体内贝伐单抗组之间观察到显着差异(标准平均差异?=-0.14,95%置信区间[CI] =-0.23至-0.05)。在IVR和玻璃体内阿柏西普组之间,最佳矫正视力,视网膜厚度或病变大小未见明显差异。与每月注射相比,IVR需要注射(PRN)可以使VA增加1.97个字母(加权平均差= 1.97,95%CI = 0.14-3.794)。 IVR和光动力疗法的联合治疗与IVR单药治疗相结合可显着提高VA 2.74个字母(加权平均差= 2.74,95%CI = 0.26-5.21)。结论:IVR和玻璃体内贝伐单抗之间的优势尚不清楚新血管性AMD。每2个月一次的玻璃体内阿柏西普给药需要更少的注射时间,但产生的疗效与每月IVR相似。 IVR PRN可以显着增加VA。结合光动力疗法,IVR疗法也可以有效增加VA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号