首页> 外文期刊>Drug Design, Development and Therapy >Efficacy and safety of ramosetron versus ondansetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of ramosetron versus ondansetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

机译:雷莫司琼与恩丹西酮对全身麻醉后术后恶心和呕吐的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting is a common side effect of general anesthesia. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of ramosetron versus ondansetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting using the most recently published randomized controlled clinical studies.Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of ramosetron and ondansetron. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Dichotomous outcomes are presented as the relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).Results: A total of 898 patients from nine selected studies were treated with antiemetics after surgery, including 450 patients who received ondansetron 4 mg and 448 patients who received ramosetron 0.3 mg. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to prevention of postoperative nausea (PON) during different time periods in the 48 hours after surgery. When comparing the efficacy of ramosetron and ondansetron in the prevention of postoperative vomiting (POV), at various time intervals in the 24 hours after surgery, ramosetron was significantly more efficient than ondansetron: 0–6 hours (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24–0.92; P=0.03), 0–24 hours (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52–1.00; P=0.05), and 6–24 hours (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31–0.84; P=0.008). At other time periods between 24 and 48?hours after surgery, ramosetron did not show better efficacy than ondansetron. When comparing the safety profiles of ramosetron and ondansetron, fewer side effects were recorded in the ramosetron group (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47–0.91; P=0.01).Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that ramosetron was more effective than ondansetron in the prevention of early POV (0–24 hours) with fewer recorded side effects. However, our study did not reveal any statistically significant differences in efficacy between ramosetron and ondansetron in the prevention of PON or late POV (at 24–48 hours).
机译:背景:术后恶心和呕吐是全身麻醉的常见副作用。在这项研究中,我们使用最新发表的随机对照临床研究对雷莫司琼和昂丹司琼在预防术后恶心和呕吐的功效和安全性方面进行了荟萃分析。方法:搜索PubMed和EMBASE进行比较的随机对照临床试验雷莫司琼和恩丹西酮的疗效和安全性。使用Review Manager 5.3版(Cochrane Collaboration,牛津,英国)进行荟萃分析。二分结果表示为相对风险(RR),置信区间(CI)为95%。结果:九项选定研究的898例患者术后接受了止吐药治疗,其中450例接受了恩丹西酮4 mg的患者和448例患者谁接受雷莫司琼0.3毫克。荟萃分析显示,两组在术后48小时内不同时间段的预防术后恶心(PON)方面无统计学差异。比较雷莫司琼和恩丹西酮在预防术后呕吐(POV)方面的功效时,在术后24小时的不同时间间隔,雷莫司琼比恩丹西酮的疗效显着提高:0–6小时(RR 0.46,95%CI 0.24– 0.92; P = 0.03),0–24小时(RR 0.72、95%CI 0.52–1.00; P = 0.05)和6–24小时(RR 0.51、95%CI 0.31-0.84; P = 0.008)。在手术后24至48小时的其他时间段,雷莫司琼未显示出比恩丹西酮更好的疗效。比较雷莫司琼和昂丹司琼的安全性时,拉莫司琼组的副作用较少(RR 0.65,95%CI 0.47-0.91; P = 0.01)。预防早期POV(0-24小时),同时减少副作用。但是,我们的研究没有显示雷莫司琼和昂丹司琼在预防PON或晚期POV(24-48小时)方面的疗效有统计学上的显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号