首页> 外文期刊>Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology >Problems of Participation and Issues of Sustainability in the Public Irrigation System in the Context of Management Transfer: Some Sociological Observations from Eastern Terai, Nepal
【24h】

Problems of Participation and Issues of Sustainability in the Public Irrigation System in the Context of Management Transfer: Some Sociological Observations from Eastern Terai, Nepal

机译:管理转移背景下公共灌溉系统的参与问题和可持续性问题:来自尼泊尔东部特赖的一些社会学观察

获取原文
           

摘要

It has been ascertained that participatory processes did not involve learning component from both agency and water users’ association for institutional and technical sustainability. The overall process of participation was superficial. There was a need of participation that underscored the empowerment of WUA with accountability. As Vermillion (2005) shares that empowerment with partnership is an emergent institutional paradigm for the irrigation sector development that places water users in the role of irrigation system governance, and government in the roles of regulator and provider of support services. There is a need to re-train the irrigation staff on the emergent institutional paradigm to empower the water users. For the empowerment with accountability, water users are to be provided enough institutional strengthening. There is the need to promote user-agency relationship positively and develop faith and confidence of the users and agency in the regime of transparency. Social scientists point out potential benefits of building successful local organizations. These benefits, for the local people, are in aspects such as empowerment, confidence-building, forming social capital, and reduction of dependency. Given the fact that participation is a process, it cannot be achieved in a short span of time with little institutional inputs. Sustainability of the management transferred irrigation systems/sub-systems definitely hinges on the broad-based and inclusive participatory processes. Keywords : participation; sustainability; management transfer; social capital and empowerment DOI: 10.3126/dsaj.v4i0.4512 Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology Vol.4 2010 pp.41-64.
机译:可以确定的是,参与过程不涉及机构和用水户的学习内容。机构和技术可持续性协会。参与的整个过程是肤浅的。需要参与,以问责制强调用水户协会的权力。正如Vermillion(2005)所分享的那样,通过伙伴关系增强权力是灌溉部门发展的新兴制度范式,使用水户扮演着灌溉系统治理的角色,而政府则扮演着监管者和支持服务提供者的角色。有必要对灌溉人员进行新的制度范式培训,以增强用水户的能力。为了增强问责制,应为用水者提供足够的体制加强。有必要积极促进用户与代理机构的关系,并在透明性方面发展用户和代理机构的信心和信心。社会科学家指出建立成功的本地组织的潜在好处。对于当地人而言,这些好处包括赋权,建立信任,形成社会资本和减少依赖性等方面。鉴于参与是一个过程,因此,在短短的时间内,几乎没有机构的投入就无法实现。管理转移灌溉系统/子系统的可持续性绝对取决于广泛和包容的参与过程。关键词:参与;可持续性;管理转移;社会资本与赋权DOI:10.3126 / dsaj.v4i0.4512 Dhaulagiri《社会学与人类学杂志》 2010年第4卷第41-64页。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号