...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Resources for Health >Closing the gender leadership gap: a multi-centre cross-country comparison of women in management and leadership in academic health centres in the European Union
【24h】

Closing the gender leadership gap: a multi-centre cross-country comparison of women in management and leadership in academic health centres in the European Union

机译:缩小性别领导力差距:欧洲联盟在大学学术保健中心的管理和领导中妇女的多中心跨国比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Women’s participation in medicine and the need for gender equality in healthcare are increasingly recognised, yet little attention is paid to leadership and management positions in large publicly funded academic health centres. This study illustrates such a need, taking the case of four large European centres: Charité – Universit?tsmedizin Berlin (Germany), Karolinska Institutet (Sweden), Medizinische Universit?t Wien (Austria), and Oxford Academic Health Science Centre (United Kingdom). Case The percentage of female medical students and doctors in all four countries is now well within the 40–60% gender balance zone. Women are less well represented among specialists and remain significantly under-represented among senior doctors and full professors. All four centres have made progress in closing the gender leadership gap on boards and other top-level decision-making bodies, but a gender leadership gap remains relevant. The level of achieved gender balance varies significantly between the centres and largely mirrors country-specific welfare state models, with more equal gender relations in Sweden than in the other countries. Notably, there are also similar trends across countries and centres: gender inequality is stronger within academic enterprises than within hospital enterprises and stronger in middle management than at the top level. These novel findings reveal fissures in the ‘glass ceiling’ effects at top-level management, while the barriers for women shift to middle-level management and remain strong in academic positions. The uneven shifts in the leadership gap are highly relevant and have policy implications. Conclusion Setting gender balance objectives exclusively for top-level decision-making bodies may not effectively promote a wider goal of gender equality. Academic health centres should pay greater attention to gender equality as an issue of organisational performance and good leadership at all levels of management, with particular attention to academic enterprises and newly created management structures. Developing comprehensive gender-sensitive health workforce monitoring systems and comparing progress across academic health centres in Europe could help to identify the gender leadership gap and utilise health human resources more effectively.
机译:背景技术人们越来越认识到女性在医学中的参与以及在医疗保健中对性别平等的需求,但很少有人关注大型公共资助的学术健康中心的领导和管理职位。这项研究以四个欧洲大型中心为例说明了这种需求:Charité–柏林tsmedizin大学(德国),Karolinska Institutet(瑞典),Medizinische Universit?t Wien(奥地利)和牛津学术健康科学中心(英国) )。案例现在,所有四个国家的女医学生和医生所占百分比均在40-60%的性别平衡区内。妇女在专家中的代表性较低,在高级医生和正教授中的女性代表性仍然很低。这四个中心在缩小董事会和其他高层决策机构的性别领导能力差距方面均取得了进展,但性别领导能力差距仍然存在。各中心之间实现的性别平衡水平差异很大,并且在很大程度上反映了特定国家的福利国家模型,瑞典的性别关系比其他国家更为平等。值得注意的是,国家和中心之间也存在类似的趋势:学术企业内部的性别不平等现象比医院企业内部更严重,而中层管理人员的性别不平等程度高于高层。这些新颖的发现揭示了高层管理人员“玻璃天花板”效应的裂缝,而女性的障碍则转移到了中层管理人员,并且在学术职位上仍然很强。领导力差距的不均衡变化非常相关,并具有政策影响。结论仅为高层决策机构制定性别平衡目标可能无法有效地促进更广泛的性别平等目标。学术保健中心应更加重视性别平等,将其作为组织绩效和在各级管理层中的良好领导的一个问题,尤其应注意学术企业和新建立的管理机构。开发全面的对性别问题敏感的卫生人力监测系统,并比较欧洲各学术卫生中心的进展情况,有助于发现性别领导力差距并更有效地利用卫生人力资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号