首页> 外文期刊>HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies >Hamartia: Foucault and Iran 1978–1979 (1: Introduction and texts)
【24h】

Hamartia: Foucault and Iran 1978–1979 (1: Introduction and texts)

机译:哈马蒂亚:福柯与伊朗1978–1979年(1:引言和文字)

获取原文
           

摘要

In 1978 Michel Foucault went to Iran as a distinguished intellectual but novice political journalist, controversially reporting on the unfolding revolution, undeniably compromising and wounding his reputation in the European intellectual community. Given the revolution's bloody aftermath and its violent theocratic development, is Foucault's Iranian expedition simply to be understood as hamartia, a critical error in judgement, with disastrous consequences for his legacy? What exactly did Foucault hope to achieve in Iran in 1978 to 1979, explicitly supporting the cause of the revolting masses and effectively isolating himself from the European intellectual community and the Western liberal tradition? This series of two articles attempts to shed light on these questions by, in the first article, 1) introducing and contextualising the philosophical issues and 2) discussing the relevant texts; then, in the second article, 3) elaborating on three explicit contributions (Janet Afary and Kevin Anderson; Ian Almond; and Danny Postel) that recently have been made on this neglected issue in Foucault scholarship and 4) eventually indicating the possible philosophical signifi cance of Foucault's peculiar mixture of na?veté and perceptivity – indeed his peculiar hamartia – regarding the events in Iran. Presenting Foucault as a ‘self-conscious Greek in Persia', the argument in both articles is that Foucault's ‘present-historical' writings on the Iran revolution were closely related to his general theoretical writings on the discourses of power and his cynical perspectives on the inherent risks of modernity. Foucault's journalistic writings on Iran in 1978 to 1979 are therefore to be appreciated as essentially philosophical contributions to his extensive modern-critical oeuvre. Foucault's perspectives on power, revolt, Otherness, ‘political spirituality' and his ‘ethics of Self-discomfort' may prove to be as significant for an understanding of our world today as the author considers them to have been during the events of September 1978 to April 1979, with Tehran's self-esteem still radiating in the desert skies 30 years later.
机译:1978年,米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)以杰出的知识分子但还是新手政治记者的身份来到伊朗,对不断发展的革命进行了有争议的报道,无可否认地损害了他在欧洲知识界的声誉。考虑到这场革命的血腥后果和剧烈的神权主义发展,福柯的伊朗远征军是否可以简单地理解为错觉,这是判断上的重大错误,对其遗产造成了灾难性的后果?福柯希望在1978年至1979年期间在伊朗取得什么成就,明确支持反抗群众的事业,并有效地将自己与欧洲知识分子和西方自由主义传统隔离开来?这一系列的两篇文章试图通过在第一篇文章中阐明这些问题:1)介绍哲学问题并将其具体化,以及2)讨论相关文本;然后,在第二篇文章中,3)详细阐述了最近在福柯奖学金研究中被忽略的三个方面(Janet Afary和Kevin Anderson; Ian Almond;和Danny Postel); 4)最终指出了可能的哲学意义关于福柯关于伊朗事件的天真和知觉奇特的混合(确实是他奇特的错觉)。两篇文章都把福柯说成是“波斯的希腊自觉希腊人”,论点是福柯关于伊朗革命的“当前历史”著作与他关于权力话语的一般理论著作以及他对伊朗权力论的愤世嫉俗的观点密切相关。现代性的固有风险。因此,福柯在1978年至1979年间发表的有关伊朗的新闻报道在本质上是对其丰富的现代批评小说所做的哲学贡献。福柯关于权力,反抗,其他,“政治灵性”及其“自我不适的伦理”的观点可能对于理解当今世界具有重要意义,正如作者认为这是在1978年9月的事件中一样。 1979年4月,德黑兰的自尊心仍在30年后的沙漠天空中散发出来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号