首页> 外文期刊>Humanities >Endlessly Responsible: Ethics as First Philosophy in Stanley Cavell’s Invocation of Literature
【24h】

Endlessly Responsible: Ethics as First Philosophy in Stanley Cavell’s Invocation of Literature

机译:无尽责任:斯坦利·卡维尔(Stanley Cavell)援引文学的伦理学作为第一哲学

获取原文
           

摘要

This essay aims to give an overview of the topic ethics and literature in Stanley Cavell’s complete oeuvre. It argues that Cavell’s preoccupation with literature is, from beginning to end, primarily ethical, even though he takes his point of departure in epistemological skepticism. Recent research on the affinities between Cavell’s early writing on Shakespearean tragedy and the ethics of Emmanuel Levinas has helped to establish this but the question of how this part of Cavell’s work is related to his later development of Emersonian perfectionism is rarely touched upon. Consequently, this essay further argues that skepticism and perfectionism in Cavell’s thinking are two sides of one and the same ethics, which are bound together by the genre of romanticism. While Cavell’s work on skepticism is primarily concerned with the other, his work on perfectionism is primarily concerned with the self. Finally, this essay marks the point where Cavell’s and Levinas’ overall thinking part ways due to the fact that Cavell embraces Emersonian perfectionism.
机译:本文旨在概述斯坦利·卡维尔(Stanley Cavell)完整著作中的伦理学和文学主题。它认为,尽管卡维尔从认识论的怀疑论出发,他对文学的关注从始至终都是道德的。卡维尔早期关于莎士比亚悲剧的著作与伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯的道德观之间的亲缘关系的最新研究有助于确立这一点,但是卡维尔的这一部分工作与他后来的爱默生完美主义发展如何相关的问题鲜有涉及。因此,本文进一步指出,卡维尔的思想中的怀疑主义和完美主义是同一伦理学的两个方面,它们都被浪漫主义流派束缚在一起。卡维尔在怀疑论方面的工作主要与他人有关,而他在完美主义方面的工作则主要与自我有关。最后,由于卡维尔接受爱默生主义的完美主义这一事实,本文标志着卡维尔和列维纳斯的整体思维有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号