首页> 外文期刊>Human Microbiome Journal >Response to article “A retrospective outcome study of 42 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, 30 of whom has irritable bowel syndrome. Half were treated with oral approaches, and half were treated with faecal microbiome transplantation”
【24h】

Response to article “A retrospective outcome study of 42 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, 30 of whom has irritable bowel syndrome. Half were treated with oral approaches, and half were treated with faecal microbiome transplantation”

机译:对“ 42例慢性疲劳综合征患者的回顾性结果研究”的回应,其中30例患有肠易激综合征。一半采用口服方法治疗,一半采用粪便微生物组移植治疗”

获取原文
           

摘要

In comparison to Faecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT), bac- teriotherapy allows a more select group of bacteria to be infused. Whilst this allows more control over the initial product, the majority of the native gut bacterial species cannot be cultured, and so cannot be in- cluded. Bacteriotherapy is also limited in its ability to supply other aspects of the microbiome (including bacterial debris, proteins, anti- microbial compounds, or bacteriophages) that may be the active agents of the FMT therapy [3]. FMT offers an attractive alternative to bac- teriotherapy as it enables the reintroduction of a complete, stable community of intestinal micro-organisms [2].
机译:与粪便微生物菌群移植(FMT)相比,细菌疗法可以注入更多选择的细菌。尽管这可以更好地控制初始产品,但大多数天然肠细菌种类无法培养,因此无法纳入。细菌疗法在提供微生物组其他方面(包括细菌碎片,蛋白质,抗微生物化合物或噬菌体)的能力方面也受到限制,而这些方面可能是FMT治疗的活性剂[3]。 FMT可以替代细菌疗法,因为它可以重新引入一个完整,稳定的肠道微生物群落[2]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号