首页> 外文期刊>Healthcare policy >Comprehensiveness of Care from the Patient Perspective: Comparison of Primary Healthcare Evaluation Instruments
【24h】

Comprehensiveness of Care from the Patient Perspective: Comparison of Primary Healthcare Evaluation Instruments

机译:从患者角度看全面护理:主要医疗保健评估工具的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Comprehensiveness relates both to scope of services offered and to a whole-person clinical approach. Comprehensive services are defined as "the provision, either directly or indirectly, of a full range of services to meet most patients' healthcare needs"; whole-person care is "the extent to which a provider elicits and considers the physical, emotional and social aspects of a patient's health and considers the community context in their care." Among instruments that evaluate primary healthcare, two had subscales that mapped to comprehensive services and to the community component of whole-person care: the Primary Care Assessment Tool – Short Form (PCAT-S) and the Components of Primary Care Index (CPCI, a limited measure of whole-person care). Objective: To examine how well comprehensiveness is captured in validated instruments that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient's perspective. Method: 645 adults with at least one healthcare contact in the previous 12 months responded to six instruments that evaluate primary healthcare. Scores were normalized for descriptive comparison. Exploratory and confirmatory (structural equation modelling) factor analysis examined fit to operational definition, and item response theory analysis examined item performance on common constructs. Results: Over one-quarter of respondents had missing responses on services offered or doctor's knowledge of the community. The subscales did not load on a single factor; comprehensive services and community orientation were examined separately. The community orientation subscales did not perform satisfactorily. The three comprehensive services subscales fit very modestly onto two factors: (1) most healthcare needs (from one provider) (CPCI Comprehensive Care, PCAT-S First-Contact Utilization) and (2) range of services (PCAT-S Comprehensive Services Available). Individual item performance revealed several problems. Conclusion: Measurement of comprehensiveness is problematic, making this attribute a priority for measure development. Range of services offered is best obtained from providers. Whole-person care is not addressed as a separate construct, but some dimensions are covered by attributes such as interpersonal communication and relational continuity.
机译:全面性既与提供的服务范围有关,也与全人临床方法有关。全面服务的定义是“直接或间接提供满足大多数患者医疗需求的全方位服务”;全人护理是“提供者在多大程度上引起并考虑患者健康的身体,情感和社会方面,并考虑其护理中的社区环境。”在评估基础医疗保健的工具中,有两个具有针对综合服务和全人护理社区组成部分的分量表:基础医疗保健评估工具–简写形式(PCAT-S)和基础医疗保健指数组成部分(CPCI,a有限的全人护理措施)。目的:检查在从患者角度评估基本医疗保健的经过验证的仪器中,如何全面性地被捕获。方法:在过去12个月中有至少一位医疗保健接触者的645名成年人对六种评估基本医疗保健的仪器做出了反应。将分数标准化以进行描述性比较。探索性和验证性(结构方程模型)因子分析检查是否适合运营定义,项目响应理论分析检查了常见构造上的项目性能。结果:超过四分之一的受访者对所提供的服务或医生对社区的了解都没有得到答复。分量表没有一个单一因素。综合服务和社区导向分别进行了审查。社区取向量表的表现不令人满意。这三个综合服务子量表仅适度适用于两个因素:(1)大多数医疗保健需求(来自一个提供者)(CPCI综合护理,PCAT-S第一接触使用)和(2)服务范围(可用的PCAT-S综合服务) )。单个项目的性能显示出几个问题。结论:全面性度量存在问题,使该属性成为度量开发的优先事项。最好从提供商那里获得所提供的服务范围。全人护理并不是作为一个单独的结构来解决的,而是某些方面被诸如人际沟通和关系连续性之类的属性所覆盖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号