首页> 外文期刊>Hepatitis Monthly >Efficacy of the Confidential Unit Exclusion Option in Blood Donors in Tehran, Iran, Determined by Using the Nucleic Acid Testing Method in 2008 and 2009
【24h】

Efficacy of the Confidential Unit Exclusion Option in Blood Donors in Tehran, Iran, Determined by Using the Nucleic Acid Testing Method in 2008 and 2009

机译:2008年和2009年使用核酸检测方法确定的伊朗德黑兰献血者中保密单位排除选项的功效

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: In recent years, the confidential unit exclusion (CUE) option has been used to increase blood safety at blood transfusion centers in several countries. The epidemiologic characteristics of diseases and demographic characteristics of patients vary in different countries; therefore, we investigated whether the CUE option is useful in Iran. In this study, we determined the prevalences of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in CUE-positive and CUE-negative units, as well as the efficacy of the CUE option. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the CUE option in reducing the prevalences of HBV and HCV in blood units. Patients and Methods: All donors were tested for the HCV antibody (anti-HCV) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Supplemental tests were performed to confirm the presence of viruses in the units that tested positive. In total, 2000 units (1000 CUE-positive units and 1000 CUE-negative units) were tested using the nucleic acid testing (NAT) method. The prevalence of infectious markers was estimated in all demographic subgroups. Results: The prevalences of HBV and HCV markers were higher in donors who opted for CUE than in those who did not. The CUE option had low sensitivity (21.5%) and positive predictive value (PPV; 20.9%) for the markers. Most of the donors who opted for CUE for the first time were men with low levels of education. Conclusions: The CUE option has low sensitivity and PPV, and its effectiveness in reducing the transmission of infectious diseases through window-period units is minimal. The CUE process can be continued in Iran because Iran is geographically located in a region where HBV is endemic; however, higher levels of education are necessary to make this process effective. Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education: The implications of the present study could be fruitful for policy makers in the domain of health particularly blood services. Moreover, given controversial issues about the efficiency of CUE, the findings of this study would help up decision makers of blood services either adopt new plans and programs or make effective modifications. Please cite this paper as: Farhadi E, Gharehbaghian A, Karimi G, Samiee S, Tavasolli F, Salimi Y. Efficacy of the Confidential Unit Exclusion Option in Blood Donors in Tehran, Iran, Determined by Using the Nucleic Acid Testing Method in 2008–2009. Hepat Mon. 2011;11(11):907-12. DOI:10.5812/kowsar.1735143X.778.
机译:背景:近年来,机密单位排除(CUE)选项已用于提高多个国家输血中心的血液安全性。疾病的流行病学特征和患者的人口统计学特征在不同国家有所不同;因此,我们调查了CUE选项在伊朗是否有用。在这项研究中,我们确定了CUE阳性和CUE阴性单位中的乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)和丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的患病率,以及CUE选项的功效。目的:本研究的目的是评估CUE方案在降低血液单位中HBV和HCV患病率方面的功效。患者和方法:测试所有供体的HCV抗体(抗HCV)和乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)。进行补充测试以确认测试阳性的单位中是否存在病毒。使用核酸测试(NAT)方法总共测试了2000个单位(1000个CUE阳性单位和1000个CUE阴性单位)。在所有人口统计学亚组中都估计了感染标志物的患病率。结果:选择CUE的捐献者中HBV和HCV标记的患病率高于未选择CUE的捐献者。 CUE选项的标记物灵敏度低(21.5%),阳性预测值(PPV; 20.9%)。首次选择CUE的大多数捐助者是文化程度较低的男性。结论:CUE选项具有较低的敏感性和PPV,并且在减少通过窗口周期单位传播传染病方面的有效性极低。在伊朗,可以继续进行CUE程序,因为伊朗的地理位置位于HBV流行地区。但是,要使此过程有效,必须进行更高水平的教育。对卫生政策/实践/研究/医学教育的意义:本研究的意义对于卫生特别是血液服务领域的政策制定者可能是富有成果的。此外,考虑到有关CUE效率的争议性问题,本研究的结果将有助于血液服务的决策者采用新的计划和程序或进行有效的修改。请引用本文为:Farhadi E,Gharehbaghian A,Karimi G,Samiee S,Tavasolli F,SalimiY。伊朗德黑兰献血者中保密单位排除选项的功效,采用2008年核酸检测方法确定2009年。肝星期一2011; 11(11):907-12。 DOI:10.5812 / kowsar.1735143X.778。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号