首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Medical Student Performance on the National Board of Medical Examiners Emergency Medicine Advanced Clinical Examination and the National Emergency Medicine M4 Exams
【24h】

Medical Student Performance on the National Board of Medical Examiners Emergency Medicine Advanced Clinical Examination and the National Emergency Medicine M4 Exams

机译:国家医学检验官急诊医学高级临床考试和国家急诊医学M4考试的医学生表现

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: In April 2013, the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) released an Advanced Clinical Examination (ACE) in emergency medicine (EM). In addition to this new resource, CDEM (Clerkship Directors in EM) provides two online, high-quality, internally validated examinations. National usage statistics are available for all three examinations, however, it is currently unknown how students entering an EM residency perform as compared to the entire national cohort. This information may help educators interpret examination scores of both EM-bound and non-EM-bound students. Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare EM clerkship examination performance between students who matched into an EM residency in 2014 to students who did not. We made comparisons were made using the EM-ACE and both versions of the National fourth year medical student (M4) EM examinations. Method: In this retrospective multi-institutional cohort study, the EM-ACE and either Version 1 (V1) or 2 (V2) of the National EM M4 examination was given to students taking a fourth-year EM rotation at five institutions between April 2013 to February 2014. We collected examination performance, including the scaled EM-ACE score, and percent correct on the EM M4 exams, and 2014 NRMP Match status. Student t-tests were performed on the examination averages of students who matched in EM as compared with those who did not. Results: A total of 606 students from five different institutions took both the EM-ACE and one of the EM M4 exams; 94 (15.5%) students matched in EM in the 2014 Match. The mean score for EM-bound students on the EM-ACE, V1 and V2 of the EM M4 exams were 70.9 (n=47, SD=9.0), 84.4 (n=36, SD=5.2), and 83.3 (n=11, SD=6.9), respectively. Mean scores for non-EM-bound students were 68.0 (n=256, SD=9.7), 82.9 (n=243, SD=6.5), and 74.5 (n=13, SD=5.9). There was a significant difference in mean scores in EM-bound and non-EM-bound student for the EM-ACE (p=0.05) and V2 (p<0.01) but not V1 (p=0.18) of the National EM M4 examination. Conclusion: Students who successfully matched in EM performed better on all three exams at the end of their EM clerkship.
机译:简介:2013年4月,美国国家医疗检查委员会(NBME)发布了急诊医学(EM)的高级临床考试(ACE)。除此新资源外,CDEM(EM的业务主管)还提供两项在线的,内部经过验证的考试。所有这三项考试的国家使用情况统计数据均可用,但是,目前尚不知道进入EM居住区的学生与整个国家/地区队列相比的表现如何。此信息可以帮助教育工作者解释EM受限和非EM受限学生的考试成绩。目标:这项研究的目的是比较2014年匹配为EM居住资格的学生与没有EM居住资格的学生之间的EM职员考试成绩。我们使用EM-ACE和国家四年级医学生(M4)EM考试的两个版本进行了比较。方法:在这项回顾性多机构队列研究中,EM-ACE和国家EM M4考试的第1版(V1)或第2版(V2)被授予在2013年4月之间在五个机构参加EM轮换四年级的学生至2014年2月。我们收集了考试成绩,包括按比例缩放的EM-ACE得分,EM M4考试的正确率以及2014年NRMP比赛状态。学生t检验是根据EM与未匹配的学生的考试平均水平进行的。结果:来自五个不同机构的606名学生同时参加了EM-ACE和其中一项EM M4考试;在2014年比赛中,有94位(15.5%)学生参加了EM比赛。 EM M4考试的EM-ACE,V1和V2的EM受限学生的平均分数分别为70.9(n = 47,SD = 9.0),84.4(n = 36,SD = 5.2)和83.3(n = 11,SD = 6.9)。非新兴市场学生的平均分数为68.0(n = 256,SD = 9.7),82.9(n = 243,SD = 6.5)和74.5(n = 13,SD = 5.9)。全国EM M4考试的EM-ACE(p = 0.05)和V2(p <0.01)和V1(p = 0.18)的EM-ACE和非EM-bound学生的平均分数存在显着差异。结论:EM培训结束时,在EM中成功匹配的学生在所有三项考试中的表现都更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号