首页> 外文期刊>Water >Semi- vs. Fully-Distributed Urban Stormwater Models: Model Set Up and Comparison with Two Real Case Studies
【24h】

Semi- vs. Fully-Distributed Urban Stormwater Models: Model Set Up and Comparison with Two Real Case Studies

机译:半分布式与全分布式城市雨水模型:模型建立与两个真实案例研究的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Urban stormwater models can be semi-distributed (SD) or fully distributed (FD). SD models are based on subcatchment units with various land use types, where rainfall is applied and runoff volumes are estimated and routed. FD models are based on the two dimensional (2D) discretization of the overland surface, which has a finer resolution with each grid-cell representing one land use type, where runoff volumes are estimated and directly routed by the 2D overland flow module. While SD models have been commonly applied in urban stormwater modeling, FD models are generally more detailed and theoretically more realistic. This paper presents a comparison between SD and FD models using two case studies in Coimbra (Portugal) and London (UK). To enable direct comparison between SD and FD setups, a model-building process is proposed and a novel sewer inlet representation is applied. SD and FD modeling results are compared against observed records in sewers and photographic records of flood events. The results suggest that FD models are more sensitive to surface storage parameters and require higher detail of the sewer network representation.
机译:城市雨水模型可以是半分布式(SD)或全分布式(FD)。 SD模型基于具有各种土地利用类型的子汇水面积单位,其中应用了降雨,并估算了径流量。 FD模型基于陆地表面的二维(2D)离散化,具有更高的分辨率,每个网格单元代表一种土地利用类型,其中径流量由2D陆地流动模块估算并直接确定路线。尽管SD模型已普遍应用于城市雨水建模中,但FD模型通常更详细,理论上也更现实。本文使用在科英布拉(葡萄牙)和伦敦(英国)的两个案例研究,对SD和FD模型进行了比较。为了实现SD和FD设置之间的直接比较,提出了模型构建过程,并应用了新颖的下水道入口表示。将SD和FD建模结果与下水道中的观测记录和洪水事件的照相记录进行比较。结果表明,FD模型对地表存储参数更敏感,并且需要更详细的下水道网络表示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号