首页> 外文期刊>Verbum et Ecclesia >Deus ex Machina ? Religious texts, spiritual capital and inequalities: In continuation of a current debate (a response to colleague Farisani)
【24h】

Deus ex Machina ? Religious texts, spiritual capital and inequalities: In continuation of a current debate (a response to colleague Farisani)

机译:死神前机械师?宗教文本,精神资本和不平等:在当前的辩论中继续(对同事法里萨尼的回应)

获取原文
           

摘要

Often, theological debates stand in the tension between idealist and realist perspectives. This is true too of a discussion in which I have participated on the Africanisation or contextualisation or relevance of the Bible in (South) Africa. In this debate I have at times been cast as being opposed to such Africanisation or contextualisation or relevance. Such criticism is mistaken. I am, however, critical of too idealistic views on the ways in which Old Testament research can impact African problems. In an interdisciplinary manner, the sociological concept of spiritual capital proves useful in illustrating my view. With this, I hope to be understood correctly and, more importantly, to contribute to greater realism concerning the relationship between research and societal problems. In that way, the Africanisation or contextualisation or relevance of the Bible in (South) Africa can become a greater reality. This is of increased importance in the post-secular time frame in which we currently find ourselves, in which the role of religion in the public sphere is again finding greater acceptance rather than being side-lined. On all counts, thus, the plight of the marginalised may be better served. Such broader acceptance of religion also demands that Bible scholarship takes full cognisance of the societal processes through which such upliftment can occur in reality. Therefore, en route to publication, this contribution is presented for critical consideration in three intellectual fora:??The Religious and Spiritual Capital session, XVIIIth International Sociological Association World Congress of Sociology (conference theme: ?Facing an unequal world?), Yokohama, Japan, 13?19 July 2014.? The Old Testament Society of South Africa Annual Conference (conference theme: ?Studying the Old Testament in South Africa, from 1994 to 2014 and beyond?), University of Johannesburg, 03?05 September 2014.? The Research Day of the Department of Biblical and Ancient Studies, University of South Africa, 25 September 2014, at which colleague E. Farisani?s University of South Africa inaugural lecture of 03 September 2013, ?Dispelling myths about African biblical hermeneutics: The role of current trends in African biblical hermeneutics in the post-apartheid South Africa? was re-presented as ?Current trends and patterns in African Biblical Hermeneutics in postapartheid South Africa: Myth or Fact?? for the purpose of critical discussion.Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: The intersection of Theology and Sociology adds concrete avenues for furthering the cause of the Africanisation of Biblical Studies.
机译:通常,神学辩论站在理想主义者和现实主义者之间的张力中。在我参与(南部)非洲圣经的非洲化或语境化或相关性的讨论中,也是如此。在这场辩论中,我有时被裁定为反对这种非洲化,情境化或相关性。这种批评是错误的。但是,我对旧约研究影响非洲问题的方式过于理想主义的观点持批评态度。以跨学科的方式,精神资本的社会学概念被证明对阐明我的观点很有用。借此,我希望能得到正确的理解,更重要的是,希望对研究与社会问题之间的关系更加现实。这样,圣经在(南部)非洲的非洲化,语境化或相关性可以成为更大的现实。在我们目前处于世俗化的后世时期,宗教在公共领域中的作用再次得到更大的认可而不是被排斥在外,这在当今的后世时期变得越来越重要。因此,从各方面来看,边缘人的困境可能会得到更好的解决。如此广泛地接受宗教也要求圣经学者充分认识到在现实中可以发生这种提升的社会过程。因此,在出版的过程中,此贡献在以下三个知识论坛中进行了重要考虑:“宗教与精神资本会议”,第十八届国际社会学协会世界社会学大会(会议主题:“面对不平等的世界”),横滨,日本,2014年7月13日至19日。南非旧约学会年会(会议主题:“从1994年至2014年及以后在南非学习旧约?”),约翰内斯堡大学,2014年9月3日至5日。南非大学圣经与古代研究系的研究日,2014年9月25日,同事E. Farisani的南非大学就职演说,2013年9月3日,“消除关于非洲圣经诠释学的神话:作用”种族隔离后的南非非洲圣经诠释学的当前趋势是什么?被重新表述为“种族隔离后南非的非洲圣经诠释学的当前趋势和模式:神话还是事实”。跨学科和/或跨学科的含义:神学和社会学的交叉为进一步推动圣经研究非洲化的事业提供了具体途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号