...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Birth weight differences between those offered financial voucher incentives for verified smoking cessation and control participants enrolled in the Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT), employing an intuitive approach and a Complier Average Causal Effects (CACE) analysis
【24h】

Birth weight differences between those offered financial voucher incentives for verified smoking cessation and control participants enrolled in the Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT), employing an intuitive approach and a Complier Average Causal Effects (CACE) analysis

机译:通过直观方法和比较者平均因果效应(CACE)分析,为经验证的戒烟和参加戒烟试验(CPIT)的参加对照的参与者提供经济优惠券奖励的人之间的出生体重差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT), which offered financial incentives for smoking cessation during pregnancy showed a clinically and statistically significant improvement in cessation. However, infant birth weight was not seen to be affected. This study re-examines birth weight using an intuitive and a complier average causal effects (CACE) method to uncover important information missed by intention-to-treat analysis. Methods CPIT offered financial incentives up to £400 to pregnant smokers to quit. With incentives, 68 women (23.1%) were confirmed non-smokers at primary outcome, compared to 25 (8.7%) without incentives, a difference of 14.3% (Fisher test, p Results Mean birth weight of potential quitters in the incentives intervention group (who therefore quit) was 3338?g compared with potential quitters in the control group (who did not quit) 3193?g. The difference attributable to incentives, was 3338 – 3193?=?145?g (95% CI ?617, +803). The mean difference in birth weight between the intervention and control groups was 21?g, and the difference in the proportion who managed to quit was 14.3%. Since the intervention consisted of the offer of incentives to quit smoking, the intervention was received by all women in the intervention group. However, “compliance” was successfully quitting with incentives, and the CACE analysis yielded an identical result, causal birth weight increase 21?g ÷ 0.143?=?145?g. Conclusions Policy makers have great difficulty giving pregnant women money to stop smoking. This study indicates that a small clinically insignificant improvement in average birth weight is likely to hide an important clinically significant increase in infants born to pregnant smokers who want to stop but cannot achieve smoking cessation without the addition of financial voucher incentives. Trial Registration ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN87508788 . Registered on 1 September 2011.
机译:背景终止妊娠试验(CPIT)为妊娠期间戒烟提供了经济诱因,显示出戒烟的临床和统计学显着改善。但是,未发现婴儿出生体重受到影响。这项研究使用一种直观且合规的平均因果效应(CACE)方法重新检查了出生体重,以发现意图治疗分析所遗漏的重要信息。方法CPIT为怀孕的吸烟者戒烟提供高达400英镑的经济奖励。有激励措施时,有68名女性(23.1%)被确定为主要结果为非吸烟者,而无激励措施的女性为25名(8.7%),相差14.3%(Fisher检验,p结果)激励措施干预组中潜在戒烟者的平均出生体重(因此退出者)为3338微克,而对照组中未退出者(未放弃者)为3193微克。奖励的差异为3338 – 3193微克= 145微克(95%CI为617, +803)。干预组和对照组之间的出生体重平均差异为21μg,设法戒烟的比例差异为14.3%。由于干预措施包括提供戒烟的诱因,因此干预措施干预组中的所有妇女都接受了“顺从性”,但是成功地放弃了“依从性”,CACE分析得出了相同的结果,因果出生体重增加了21?g÷0.143?=?145?g。给孕妇钱给圣女很大的困难吸烟。这项研究表明,平均吸烟体重的临床上微不足道的改善很可能掩盖了那些希望戒烟但如果不增加经济优惠券就无法戒烟的孕妇吸烟者所生婴儿的重要临床显着增加。试用注册ISRCTN注册中心,ISRCTN87508788。 2011年9月1日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号