...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example
【24h】

The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example

机译:在现实的RCT中构建和测试中级理论的三个阶段:理论和方法案例

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of social interventions are often criticised as failing to open the ‘black box’ whereby they only address questions about ‘what works’ without explaining the underlying processes of implementation and mechanisms of action, and how these vary by contextual characteristics of person and place. Realist RCTs are proposed as an approach to evaluation science that addresses these gaps while preserving the strengths of RCTs in providing evidence with strong internal validity in estimating effects. Methods In the context of growing interest in designing and conducting realist trials, there is an urgent need to offer a worked example to provide guidance on how such an approach might be practically taken forward. The aim of this paper is to outline a three-staged theoretical and methodological process of undertaking a realist RCT using the example of the evaluation of a whole-school restorative intervention aiming to reduce aggression and bullying in English secondary schools. Discussion First, informed by the findings of our initial pilot trial and sociological theory, we elaborate our theory of change and specific a priori hypotheses about how intervention mechanisms interact with context to produce outcomes. Second, we describe how we will use emerging findings from the integral process evaluation within the RCT to refine, and add to, these a priori hypotheses before the collection of quantitative, follow-up data. Third, we will test our hypotheses using a combination of process and outcome data via quantitative analyses of effect mediation (examining mechanisms) and moderation (examining contextual contingencies). The results are then used to refine and further develop the theory of change. Conclusion The aim of the realist RCT approach is thus not merely to assess whether the intervention is effective or not, but to develop empirically informed mid-range theory through a three-stage process. There are important implications for those involved with reporting and reviewing RCTs, including the use of new, iterative protocols. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10751359 (Registered 11 March 2014)
机译:背景技术社会干预的随机对照试验(RCT)通常被批评为无法打开“黑匣子”,从而仅解决有关“什么可行”的问题,而没有解释实施的基本过程和作用机制,以及这些变化如何因情况而异。人和地方的特征。提出了现实主义RCT作为评估科学的一种方法,它可以解决这些差距,同时保留RCT在提供有力的内部有效性评估证据方面的优势。方法在对设计和进行现实主义试验的兴趣日益浓厚的背景下,迫切需要提供一个可行的示例,以指导如何实际采用这种方法。本文的目的是通过评估旨在减少英语中学的攻击性和欺凌行为的全校恢复性干预的示例,概述进行现实主义RCT的三个阶段的理论和方法学过程。讨论首先,根据我们的初步试验研究和社会学理论的发现,我们详细阐述了变化理论以及关于干预机制如何与环境相互作用以产生结果的特定先验假设。其次,我们描述了在收集定量的后续数据之前,我们将如何使用RCT中整体过程评估中的新发现来完善和添加这些先验假设。第三,我们将通过过程和结果数据的组合,通过对效果调解(检查机制)和调节(进行情境偶然性)的定量分析,来检验我们的假设。然后将结果用于完善和进一步发展变化理论。结论因此,现实主义RCT方法的目的不仅是评估干预措施是否有效,而且还需要通过三个阶段的过程来发展经验丰富的中端理论。对于报告和审查RCT的人员来说,这具有重要的意义,包括使用新的迭代协议。试用注册当前对照试验ISRCTN10751359(2014年3月11日注册)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号