...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

机译:一项应急管理干预措施的临床和成本效益与常规治疗相比的随机对照试验,以减少大麻使用和减少早期精神病复发(CIRCLE):一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Around 35–45?% of people in contact with services for a first episode of psychosis are using cannabis. Cannabis use is associated with delays in remission, poorer clinical outcomes, significant increases in the risk of relapse, and lower engagement in work or education. While there is a clear need for effective interventions, so far only very limited benefits have been achieved from psychological interventions. Contingency management (CM) is a behavioural intervention in which specified desired behavioural change is reinforced through financial rewards. CM is now recognised to have a substantial evidence base in some contexts and its adoption in the UK is advocated by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance as a treatment for substance or alcohol misuse. However, there is currently little published data testing its effectiveness for reducing cannabis use in early psychosis. Methods CIRCLE is a two-arm, rater-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a CM intervention for reducing cannabis use among young people receiving treatment from UK Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services. EIP service users ( n =?544) with a recent history of cannabis use will be recruited. The experimental group will receive 12 once-weekly CM sessions, and a voucher reward if urinalysis shows that they have not used cannabis in the previous week. Both the experimental and the control groups will be offered an Optimised Treatment as Usual (OTAU) psychoeducational package targeting cannabis use. Assessment interviews will be performed at consent, at 3?months, and at 18?months. The primary outcome is time to relapse, defined as admission to an acute mental health service. Secondary outcomes include proportion of cannabis-free urine samples during the intervention period, severity of positive psychotic symptoms, quality-adjusted life years, and engagement in work or education. Discussion CIRCLE is a RCT of CM for cannabis use in young people with a recent history of psychosis (EIP service users) and recent cannabis use. It is designed to investigate whether the intervention is a clinically and cost-effective treatment for cannabis use. It is intended to inform future treatment delivery, particularly in EIP settings. Trial registration ISRCTN33576045 : doi 10.1186/ISRCTN33576045 , registered on 28 November 2011.
机译:背景知识首次精神病发作时与服务机构接触的人中约有35%至45%使用大麻。大麻的使用与缓解时间延迟,临床效果较差,复发风险显着增加以及工作或教育投入减少有关。尽管显然需要有效的干预措施,但到目前为止,心理干预措施只能带来非常有限的收益。应急管理(CM)是一种行为干预,通过财务奖励加强了特定的期望行为变化。现在,人们公认CM在某些情况下具有充分的证据基础,并且在美国国家卫生和医疗保健研究院(NICE)的指导下提倡在英国采用CM作为药物或酒精滥用的治疗方法。但是,目前很少有公开数据测试其在减少早期精神病中减少大麻使用的有效性。方法CIRCLE是一项双臂,双盲,随机对照试验(RCT),用于研究CM干预措施减少接受英国精神病早期干预(EIP)治疗的年轻人中大麻使用的临床效果和成本效益。将招募具有最近大麻使用史的EIP服务用户(n = 544)。实验小组每周将接受12次CM课,如果尿液分析显示他们在前一周没有使用过大麻,将获得优惠券奖励。将为实验组和对照组提供针对大麻使用的“最佳治疗方法”(通常)(OTAU)心理教育套餐。评估访谈将在获得同意后,3个月和18个月时进行。主要结果是复发时间,定义为接受急性心理健康服务。次要结果包括干预期间无大麻尿液样本的比例,精神病阳性症状的严重程度,质量调整的生命年以及从事工作或教育的程度。讨论CIRCLE是CM,用于患有近期精神病史(EIP服务使用者)和最近使用大麻的年轻人中的大麻使用。它旨在调查干预措施是否是针对大麻使用的临床且经济高效的治疗方法。旨在告知将来的治疗交付,尤其是在EIP设置中。试用注册ISRCTN33576045:doi 10.1186 / ISRCTN33576045,于2011年11月28日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号