...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Reminiscence groups for people with dementia and their family carers: pragmatic eight-centre randomised trial of joint reminiscence and maintenance versus usual treatment: a protocol
【24h】

Reminiscence groups for people with dementia and their family carers: pragmatic eight-centre randomised trial of joint reminiscence and maintenance versus usual treatment: a protocol

机译:痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者的怀旧人群:联合怀旧和维持与常规治疗的实用八中心随机试验:方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The growing number of people with dementia, and the increasing cost of care, provides a major incentive to develop and test methods of supporting them in the community for longer. Most attention has been given to pharmacological interventions, but there is increasing recognition that psychosocial interventions may be equally effective, even preferable where medication has negative side-effects. Reminiscence groups, run by professionals and volunteers, which use photographs, recordings and other objects to trigger personal memories are probably the most popular therapeutic approach to working with people with dementia, but there is little evidence for their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. The recent inclusion of family carers in groups with people with dementia, notably in our own pilot studies, has generated informal evidence that this joint approach improves relationships between people with dementia and their carers, and benefits both. Design and methods This multi-centre, pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of joint reminiscence groups for people with dementia and their family care-givers has two parallel arms – an intervention group and a control group who receive care as usual. The intervention consists of joint reminiscence groups held weekly for twelve consecutive weeks, followed by monthly maintenance sessions for a further seven months. The primary outcome measures are the quality of life of people with dementia, as assessed by QoL-AD, and their care-givers' mental health as assessed by the GHQ-28. Secondary outcomes include: the autobiographical memories of people with dementia; the quality of the relationship between them and their care-givers; and the levels of depression and anxiety felt by them and their care-giver. Using a 5% significance level, comparison of 200 pairs attending joint reminiscence groups with 200 pairs receiving usual treatment will yield 80% power to detect a standardised difference of 0.38 in the QoL-AD rated by the person with dementia and 0.28 in the GHQ-28 or carer-rated QoL-AD. The trial will include a cost-effectiveness analysis from a public sector perspective. Discussion Our Cochrane review (2005) on reminiscence therapy for people with dementia did not identify any rigorous trials or economic analyses in this field. Trial Registration ISRCTN42430123
机译:背景技术痴呆症患者人数的增加以及护理费用的不断增加,极大地刺激了人们开发和测试支持他们在社区中生活时间更长的方法。人们对药理学干预给予了最大的关注,但是越来越多的人认识到,社会心理干预可能同样有效,甚至在药物具有负面副作用的情况下更可取。由专业人士和志愿者组成的怀旧团体使用照片,录音和其他物体来触发个人记忆,可能是与痴呆症患者一起使用的最受欢迎的治疗方法,但是几乎没有证据表明它们的有效性和成本效益。最近,将家庭照顾者与痴呆症患者一起纳入人群中,特别是在我们自己的试点研究中,已经产生了非正式证据,表明这种联合方法改善了痴呆症患者与其照顾者之间的关系,并使双方受益。设计与方法这项多中心,务实的随机对照试验(RCT)旨在评估联合回忆组对痴呆症患者及其家庭照护者的有效性和成本效益,它有两个平行的部分-一个干预组和一个对照组照常接受护理。干预包括连续十二周每周举行一次的联合怀旧小组,然后每月进行另外七个月的维护。主要结果指标是根据QoL-AD评估的痴呆症患者的生活质量,以及根据GHQ-28评估其护理人员的心理健康状况。次要结果包括:痴呆症患者的自传记忆;他们与其照顾者之间关系的质量;他们以及他们的照顾者所感受到的抑郁和焦虑程度。使用5%的显着性水平,将200对参加关节怀旧组与接受常规治疗的200对进行比较将产生80%的功效,以检测痴呆症患者的QoL-AD的标准差为0.38,GHQ-AD的标准差为0.28。 28或护理等级QoL-AD。该试验将包括从公共部门角度进行的成本效益分析。讨论我们对痴呆症患者的回忆疗法的Cochrane综述(2005)并未发现该领域的任何严格试验或经济分析。试用注册ISRCTN42430123

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号