首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Family Practice >The Effect of a Seminar Series on Third Year Students' Attitudes Toward the Interactions of Drug Companies and Physicians
【24h】

The Effect of a Seminar Series on Third Year Students' Attitudes Toward the Interactions of Drug Companies and Physicians

机译:研讨会系列对三年级学生对待药物公司和医师互动的态度的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundMedical students are frequently subjected to the influences of pharmaceutical companies including gifts and food. These interactions while seemingly trivial can lead to prescribing habits that are not in the best interests of patients. We have instituted a seminars series reviewing articles about these interactions.MethodsA questionnaire was developed to evaluate changes in students' attitudes before and after the seminars. A control group who didn't take part in the seminars was also evaluated. ResultsSome groups of students had a statistically significant more cautious attitude towards pharmaceutical companies after the seminar. Female students were statistically less likely to accept gifts after the seminar series.ConclusionsA seminar series concerning the influences of pharmaceutical companies on physicians can produce significant changes in some students' attitudes towards drug company gifts. Introduction The interaction between physicians and pharmaceutical companies is becoming an area of great concern to both the medical profession and the public.1 The acceptance of gifts from pharmaceutical representatives, the funding of CME activities, the payment for speaking, and the funding of research have all been viewed as possible sources of conflict of interest for physicians in their dealings with their patients.2,3 While numerous studies have demonstrated the effects of pharmaceutical firm's enticements on the prescribing behavior of physicians it is hoped that early intervention during medical school might allow the students to better understand the conflict of interest that occurs when gifts and other financial incentives are accepted . 4,5,6 Presently medical students' attitudes towards this interactions are often permissive and recommendations by the Accreditation Council on Graduate Education for stricter policies have not produced results at most medical schools.7 Medical students are felt to be at particular risk for unrecognized influence by pharmaceutical company marketing efforts. 8 A program at one medical school utilized pharmacist to play the role of pharmaceutical representatives to model a promotional presentation to medical students enabling the students to think critically about how these presentations might affect their eventual prescribing practices. A curriculum for family practice residents that consisted of a faculty-led debate and discussion of a review of physician-pharmaceutical industry interactions was found to promote more cautious attitudes toward pharmaceuticals marketing. 10 Such programs are very important and describe some methods that could be used to explore the complex issues involved with physician and pharmaceutical company interactions.At Jefferson Medical College a series of 4 seminars were conducted with 3rd year medical students to explore their attitudes towards pharmaceutical and physician interactions before and after a discussion of leading journal articles and current books on the topic. Articles were specifically chosen to represent as much as possible various outlooks on the issues. Topics such as the effect of gifts from pharmaceutical representatives and subsequent prescribing practices, the actual amount of money spent on drug development and the influence of pharmaceutical companies on medical journals were explored. Articles on such topics as the dangers of over governmental regulation and importance of developing new drugs were used to balance the discussions. Each student was assigned an article to present to his/her fellow students. Having the students conduct the presentations was found to be a very effective way of making sure that the students were fully engaged in the seminars. A faculty member(FWM) was present to serve as a moderator and to make sure that the discussion covered all of the key areas. Methods The participants in this study were medical students who were taking their third-year Family Medicine Clerkship. About one-half of the students too
机译:背景医学生经常受到制药公司的影响,包括礼物和食品。这些相互作用虽然看似微不足道,但可能导致开出不符合患者最佳利益的处方习惯。我们已经建立了一个研讨会系列,回顾了有关这些相互作用的文章。方法编制了一份问卷,以评估研讨会前后学生态度的变化。还对未参加研讨会的对照组进行了评估。结果研讨会后,一些学生对制药公司的态度在统计学上显着更为谨慎。从统计学上讲,在参加系列讨论会之后,女学生接受礼物的可能性较小。结论有关制药公司对医生的影响的系列讨论会导致一些学生对药品公司赠予的态度发生重大变化。引言医师与制药公司之间的互动正成为医学界和公众极为关注的领域。1接受制药代表的礼物,继续医学教育活动的资金,演讲费和研究资金所有这些都被认为是医师与患者打交道的可能利益冲突之源。2,3尽管许多研究已经证明了制药公司的诱惑对医师开处方行为的影响,但希望医学院的早期干预可能会允许让学生更好地理解接受礼物和其他经济刺激时发生的利益冲突。 4,5,6目前,医学生对这种相互作用的态度通常是允许的,并且研​​究生教育认证委员会针对更严格的政策提出的建议在大多数医学院中并未产生效果。7认为医学生面临着无法识别的影响的特殊风险通过制药公司的营销努力。 8一所医学院的一个计划利用药剂师扮演药房代表的角色,为向医学生宣传的演示文稿建模,使学生能够批判性地思考这些演示文稿如何影响他们最终的处方实践。发现了一种由家庭教师组成的课程,其中包括由教师主导的辩论和对医师-制药行业相互作用的回顾的讨论,以提高人们对药品营销的谨慎态度。 10这样的程序非常重要,并描述了一些可用于探索与医生和制药公司互动有关的复杂问题的方法。在杰斐逊医学院,三年级的医学生举办了一系列4场研讨会,探讨了他们对制药和制药业的态度。在讨论有关该主题的领先期刊文章和最新书籍之前和之后的医生互动。选择文章是为了尽可能代表各种问题的观点。探讨了诸如药品代表赠送礼物的效果和随后的处方做法,在药品开发上实际花费的金额以及药品公司对医学期刊的影响等主题。有关诸如过度政府监管的危险性和开发新药的重要性的文章被用来平衡讨论。每个学生都被分配给他/她的同学们展示的文章。发现让学生进行演讲是确保学生充分参与研讨会的一种非常有效的方法。一位教职员工(FWM)担任主持人,并确保讨论涵盖所有关键领域。方法本研究的参与者为正在接受三年级家庭医学秘书的医学生。大约一半的学生

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号