首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management >The impact of a combined intervention program: an educational and clinical pharmacist’s intervention to improve prescribing pattern in hospitalized geriatric patients at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
【24h】

The impact of a combined intervention program: an educational and clinical pharmacist’s intervention to improve prescribing pattern in hospitalized geriatric patients at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

机译:联合干预计划的影响:沙特阿拉伯利雅得国王阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医学城的一名教育和临床药剂师的干预措施,旨在改善住院老年患者的处方方式

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: There is a difference between evidence-based guidelines for geriatric patients and clinical practice of physicians. Prescribing potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) can be attributed to the fact that many physicians are not aware of PIMs usage. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a combined intervention program comprising an educational and clinical pharmacist intervention to reduce the incidence of PIMs among hospitalized geriatric patients. Methods: This was a prospective pre-test versus post-test design study. The screening tool of older persons’ prescriptions, 2nd version, and 2015 American Geriatric Society Beers’ criteria were used to assess the appropriateness of medications prescribed for geriatric inpatients. The study was carried out in the medical wards of the Department of Medicine at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Results: Four hundred geriatric patients were enrolled in the study: 200 in a pre-intervention group (control) and 200 in the intervention group. After the combined intervention, the incidence rate of PIMs decreased significantly from 61% to 29.5% ( p <0.001). Out of 317 recommendations given by the clinical pharmacist, the physicians accepted a total of 196 (61.83%) recommendations. The most common PIMs to avoid regardless of diagnosis of geriatric patients before interventions were first-generation antihistamines (46%), sliding scale insulin (18.5%), antipsychotics (6.5%), benzodiazepines (9.5%), and antiarrhythmic drugs (15%). Conclusion: Using a combined intervention program that comprises an educational intervention of updated evidence-based guidelines and clinical pharmacist intervention would add a significant value to improve prescribing patterns in hospitalized geriatric patients.
机译:背景:老年患者的循证指南与医师的临床实践之间存在差异。开处方可能不适当的药物(PIM)可以归因于许多医生并不了解PIM的使用情况。目的:本研究的目的是评估一项联合干预计划的有效性,该计划包括教育和临床药剂师干预措施,以减少住院老年患者中PIM的发生率。方法:这是一项前瞻性测试与测试后设计研究。老年人处方筛查工具(第二版)和2015年美国老年学会啤酒标准被用于评估老年患者开药的适当性。这项研究是在沙特阿拉伯利雅得阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医学城的医学系内的医学病房中进行的。结果:400名老年患者参加了该研究:干预前组(对照组)为200名,干预组为200名。联合干预后,PIM的发生率从61%显着降低到29.5%(p <0.001)。在临床药剂师给出的317条建议中,医生共接受了196条(61.83%)建议。在干预之前,无论是否诊断老年患者,最需要避免的PIM是第一代抗组胺药(46%),滑移胰岛素(18.5%),抗精神病药(6.5%),苯二氮卓(9.5%)和抗心律不齐药物(15%) )。结论:采用联合干预方案,其中包括对循证指南进行更新的教育干预和临床药剂师的干预,将为改善住院老年患者的处方方式带来重大价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号