首页> 外文期刊>The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal >Safety and Efficacy of Fluticasone Propionate/SalmeterolHydrofluoroalkane 134a Metered-Dose-Inhaler Comparedwith Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Diskus in Patientswith Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
【24h】

Safety and Efficacy of Fluticasone Propionate/SalmeterolHydrofluoroalkane 134a Metered-Dose-Inhaler Comparedwith Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Diskus in Patientswith Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

机译:丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗氢氟烷烃134a定量吸入器与丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的安全性和有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To provide information on the efficacy and safety of Fluticasone Propionate/SalmeterolHydrofluoroalkane 134a Metered-Dose-Inhaler 230/42mcg (FSC MDI) and its comparable dose of FluticasonePropionate/Salmeterol DISKUS 250/50mcg (FSC DISKUS) in patients with COPD.Methods: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 12 week study was designed to evaluate FSC MDI treatmentresponses as compared with FSC DISKUS. The primary comparison of interest was non-inferiority between the FSC MDItreatment group and the FSC DISKUS treatment group assessed in terms of 2-hour post-dose FEV1 change from baselineat endpoint. The non-inferiority criterion bound was 75mL (lower confidence limit of -75mL). Inclusion criteria: Male orfemale aged ≥ 40, post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≤ 70% predicted normal, FEV1/FVC ≤ 70% and ≥ 10 pack years smokinghistory. Adverse events were recorded by patients throughout the study on daily diary cards. Adverse events werecollected in eCRFs at all clinic visits and during a final follow-up phone call.Results: Patients (N=247) were randomized to FSC MDI (FEV1% 49.3 + 12.3, FEV1/FVC 50.5 + 10.0) and FSC DISKUS(FEV1% 48.4 + 11.0, FEV1/FVC 50.3 + 10.3). From an ANCOVA model the least squares (LS) mean difference (FSCMDI– FSC DISKUS) for the 2-hour post dose FEV1 at endpoint was -2.0mL (95% CI -64mL, 59mL). Pre-dose FEV1,FVC, PEF, and albuterol use were also similar between the two formulations. The most common adverse events (AE)during treatment were headache (8% and 6% of patients), nasopharyngitis (4% and 6%), cough (3% and 4%), and sinusitis(2% and 5%) for FSC MDI and FSC DISKUS, respectively. Pneumonia was recorded as an AE for 2 (2%) patients in theFSC DISKUS arm.Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate that FSC MDI has a similar efficacy and safety profile to FSC DISKUSin COPD patients.
机译:目的:提供有关丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗氢氟烷烃134a定量吸入器230 / 42mcg(FSC MDI)及其等效剂量丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗DISKUS 250 / 50mcg(FSC DISKUS)的疗效和安全性的信息。 :这项多中心,随机,双盲,12周研究旨在评估与FSC DISKUS相比FSC MDI治疗反应。感兴趣的主要比较是FSC MDI治疗组与FSC DISKUS治疗组之间的非劣效性,根据从基线开始的2小时给药后FEV1变化进行评估。非劣效性标准水平为75mL(较低的置信度下限为-75mL)。纳入标准:≥40岁的男性或女性,支气管扩张剂后FEV1≤70%预测正常,FEV1 / FVC≤70%且吸烟史≥10包年。在整个研究中,患者在每日日记卡上记录了不良事件。结果:患者(N = 247)被随机分为FSC MDI(FEV1%49.3 + 12.3,FEV1 / FVC 50.5 + 10.0)和FSC DISKUS(N = 247)。 FEV1%48.4 + 11.0,FEV1 / FVC 50.3 + 10.3)。根据ANCOVA模型,终点后FEV1 2小时的最小平方(LS)平均差异(FSCMDI– FSC DISKUS)为-2.0mL(95%CI -64mL,59mL)。两种制剂之间的剂量前FEV1,FVC,PEF和沙丁胺醇的使用也相似。治疗期间最常见的不良事件(AE)为头痛(分别占患者的8%和6%),鼻咽炎(分别为4%和6%),咳嗽(分别为3%和4%)和鼻窦炎(分别为2%和5%) FSC MDI和FSC DISKUS。在FSC DISKUS组中有2名(2%)患者被记录为肺炎AE。结论:这是第一项证明FSC MDI与FPD DISKUS在COPD患者中具有相似疗效和安全性的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号