首页> 外文期刊>The Open Medical Devices Journal >Inter-Instrument Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopic Analysers
【24h】

Inter-Instrument Comparison of Bioimpedance Spectroscopic Analysers

机译:生物阻抗光谱分析仪的仪器间比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Three commercially available bioimpedance spectroscopy analysers were compared for technical performanceand for their design purpose of prediction of body composition. All three analysers were electronically stable, remainingin calibration over a year, and provided highly reproducible (coefficients of variation < 0.5%) and accurate (within 0.5%of component values) measurements of impedances of a test circuit. Whole body impedances in humans were highly correlatedbetween all three instruments although significant biases between instruments were observed, particularly for themeasurement of intracellular resistance. However, when the measured impedances, and using instrument-specific resistivitycoefficients, were used to predict fat-free mass of the subjects, the difference between instruments was approximately1.7 kg fat-free mass, a value comparable with that observed for the error associated with reference methods such asmulti-compartment models of body composition. It is concluded that, with appropriate regard to standardisation of measurementprotocol, all three analysers are suitable for their design purpose of estimating body composition in humans.
机译:比较了三种市售的生物阻抗光谱分析仪的技术性能和预测人体成分的设计目的。所有三个分析仪都是电子稳定的,可以在一年内保持校准,并提供了可重复性高(变化系数<0.5%)和准确(在组件值的0.5%之内)的测试电路阻抗测量结果。尽管观察到仪器之间的显着偏差,尤其是在细胞内电阻的测量上,但人体的整体阻抗在所有三种仪器之间高度相关。但是,当使用测得的阻抗并使用特定于仪器的电阻率系数来预测受试者的无脂肪质量时,仪器之间的差异约为1.7千克无脂肪质量,该值与所观察到的误差相当参考方法,例如身体组成的多隔室模型。结论是,在适当考虑到测量协议的标准化的情况下,所有这三种分析仪都适合于其设计目的,即估计人体的成分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号