...
首页> 外文期刊>The Keio Journal of Medicine >A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AVERAGE REFERENCE AND ROUTINE MONOPOLAR EAR LOBE REFERENCE ELECTRODES IN EEG RECORDING
【24h】

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AVERAGE REFERENCE AND ROUTINE MONOPOLAR EAR LOBE REFERENCE ELECTRODES IN EEG RECORDING

机译:脑电记录中平均参考值和常规单耳耳垂参考电极的比较研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It seems to us that there has not been a paper about Average Reference Electrode Method since the publication by Goldman' and Offner2 in 1950. From the results mentioned above, comparing with MP, characteristics of Ave. R. are:(1) In many cases, localized EEG abnormality was more clearly represented.(2) As to non-focal EEG abnormality, records which are very useful to diagnosis can be obtained, except a extremely low amplitude brain potential.(3) Since Ave. R. did not use ear lobe as reference, the electrical activity in temporal region was easily observed, and artifact by abnormal electrical activity did not take place.(4) Physiological artifact was difficult to mix. On the other hand, alternative current artifact tended to slightly mix on some occasions. Since amplitude was represented lowerly than the case in which ear lobe was used as reference electrode, it is not suitable to record low amplitude.From those results, it can be emphasized that Ave. R. is much more helpful for localizing space taking lesion of the brain than MP. And we convince that accuracy of EEG diagnosis can be increased by using Ave. R.
机译:在我们看来,自1950年Goldman'和Offner2发表以来,还没有关于平均参比电极法的论文。根据上述结果,与MP相比,R。Ave.的特征是:(1)在许多方面(2)对于非局灶性脑电图异常,除极低幅度的脑电势外,可获得对诊断非常有用的记录。(3)由于Ave. R.没有以耳垂为参考,很容易观察到颞区的电活动,未发生异常电活动造成的伪影。(4)生理伪影难以混合。另一方面,替代的电流伪像在某些情况下往往会稍微混合。由于幅度表示的幅度低于使用耳垂作为参比电极的幅度,因此不适合记录低幅度的幅度。从这些结果可以看出,R。Ave.对定位病变部位的空间更加有帮助。大脑比MP。我们相信使用Ave. R可以提高EEG诊断的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号