首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet Planetary Health >Effect of evacuation and displacement on the association between flooding and mental health outcomes: a cross-sectional analysis of UK survey data
【24h】

Effect of evacuation and displacement on the association between flooding and mental health outcomes: a cross-sectional analysis of UK survey data

机译:疏散和流离失所对洪水与心理健康结果之间关系的影响:英国调查数据的横断面分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Summary Background Extensive flooding occurred during the winter of 2013–14 in England. Previous studies have shown that flooding affects mental health. Using data from the 2013–14 Public Health England National Study of Flooding and Health, we compared the prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder between participants displaced by flooding and those flooded, but not displaced, 1 year after flooding. Methods In this multivariable ordinal regression analysis, we collected data from a cross-sectional survey collected 1 year after the flooding event from flood-affected postcodes in five counties in England. The analysis was restricted to individuals whose homes were flooded (n=622) to analyse displacement due to flooding. The primary outcome measures were depression (measured by the PHQ-2 depression scale) and anxiety (measured by the two-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder [GAD]-2 anxiety scale), and post-traumatic stress disorder (measured by the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist [PCL]-6 scale). We adjusted analyses for recorded potential confounders. We also analysed duration of displacement and amount of warning received. Findings People who were displaced from their homes were significantly more likely to have higher scores on each scale; odds ratio (OR) for depression 1·95 (95% CI 1·30–2·93), for anxiety 1·66 (1·12–2·46), and for post-traumatic stress disorder 1·70 (1·17–2·48) than people who were not displaced. The increased risk of depression was significant even after adjustment for severity of flooding. Scores for depression and post-traumatic stress disorder were higher in people who were displaced and reported receiving no warning than those who had received a warning more than 12 h in advance of flooding (p=0·04 for depression, p=0·01 for post-traumatic stress disorder), although the difference in anxiety scores was not significant. Interpretation Displacement after flooding was associated with higher reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder 1 year after flooding. The amount of warning received showed evidence of being protective against symptoms of the three mental illnesses studied, and the severity of flooding might be the reason for some, but not all, of the differences between the groups. Funding National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Units (HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King's College London, Environmental Change and Health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and Evaluation of Interventions at the University of Bristol, Public Health England.
机译:小结背景在2013–14冬季,英国发生了大面积的洪水。先前的研究表明,洪水会影响心理健康。使用2013–14年《英国国家公共卫生与水灾与健康研究》中的数据,我们比较了因水灾而流离失所的参与者和被水灾但没有流离失所的参与者在1年后的抑郁,焦虑和创伤后应激障碍症状的患病率洪水。方法在这项多变量序数回归分析中,我们从洪水事件发生1年后收集的横断面调查数据中,从英格兰五个县的受洪灾影响的邮政编码中收集了数据。该分析仅限于房屋被洪水淹没的个人(n = 622)来分析洪水造成的位移。主要的预后指标是抑郁(通过PHQ-2抑郁量表测量)和焦虑(通过两项广义焦虑症[GAD] -2焦虑量表测量),以及创伤后应激障碍(通过创伤后测量)压力障碍清单[PCL] -6量表)。我们调整了对已记录的潜在混杂因素的分析。我们还分析了流离失所的持续时间和收到的警告数量。调查结果流离失所的人在每个等级上的得分都更高。抑郁1·95(95%CI 1·30-2·93),焦虑1·66(1·12-2·46)和创伤后应激障碍1·70(1)的优势比(OR) ·17–2·48)。即使根据洪水的严重程度进行调整,患抑郁症的风险也很明显。流离失所和报告没有受到警告的人的抑郁和创伤后应激障碍得分高于洪水前超过12小时收到警告的人(抑郁的p = 0·04,p = 0·01 (创伤后应激障碍)),尽管焦虑评分的差异并不明显。解释洪水后1年,淹水后移位与更高的报道的抑郁,焦虑和创伤后应激障碍症状相关。收到的警告数量表明,可以预防所研究的三种精神疾病的症状,洪水的严重程度可能是两组之间某些(但不是全部)差异的原因。为国家卫生研究院的健康保护研究单位(HPRU)提供资金,用于伦敦国王学院的应急准备和响应,伦敦卫生与热带医学学院的环境变化与健康以及英国公共卫生的布里斯托大学的干预评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号