首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research >ReadMax—a novel reading and scoring approach for EGFR gene copy number to predict therapeutic benefit of erlotinib treatment in EGFR wild‐type non‐small‐cell lung cancer
【24h】

ReadMax—a novel reading and scoring approach for EGFR gene copy number to predict therapeutic benefit of erlotinib treatment in EGFR wild‐type non‐small‐cell lung cancer

机译:ReadMax-一种EGFR基因拷贝数的新颖阅读和评分方法,可预测厄洛替尼治疗EGFR野生型非小细胞肺癌的疗效

获取原文
           

摘要

AbstractEGFR mutation testing is now well established as a means of selecting the optimal first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, deciding on the correct treatment for EGFR wild-type NSCLC remains a challenge. EGFR fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) testing of gene copy number has been a promising marker, but has provided mixed results despite attempts to standardize the reading and scoring process. The novel ReadMax reading and scoring system focuses on the most aberrant cells, to identify oncogene addiction, rather than taking a representative reading as in the Colorado method. The methodology was developed using historical samples from the TRUST and MERIT studies, followed by re-reading of the samples from the SATURN trial. Analysis of samples using the ReadMax methodology revealed that progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were improved in patients with ReadMax FISH-positive (RM FISH+) tumours, compared with those whose tumours were not RM FISH+: PFS hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.52 for RM FISH+ versus 0.93 for not RM FISH+; OS HRs were 0.69 and 0.92, respectively. For PFS, HR for RM FISH+ versus not RM FISH+ in the SATURN erlotinib group was 0.53 (p = 0.003). The PFS and OS results were also similar in the EGFR wild-type population (PFS HRs were 0.63 and 0.96; OS HRs were 0.61 and 0.84, respectively), although amplification of the EGFR gene in patients with EGFR wild-type disease was not found to be predictive of treatment outcomes, which was unexpected but not unprecedented. KRAS status was not found to affect outcomes. Further experience is required to refine the ReadMax methodology and fully establish its validity and robustness. In conclusion, the ReadMax scoring system to identify patients with EGFR FISH-positive NSCLC is a promising technique, which could improve treatment options and outcomes for patients with advanced NSCLC, in particular for EGFR wild-type tumours.
机译:摘要EGFR突变测试现已被广泛确立,可以为晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者选择最佳的一线治疗方法。然而,决定对EGFR野生型NSCLC的正确治疗仍然是一个挑战。基因拷贝数的EGFR荧光原位杂交(FISH)测试一直是有前途的标记,但是尽管尝试标准化阅读和评分过程,但结果却不尽相同。新颖的ReadMax阅读和评分系统着眼于最异常的细胞,以鉴定致癌基因成瘾,而不是像在科罗拉多州方法中那样进行代表性阅读。该方法是使用TRUST和MERIT研究的历史样本开发的,然后重新读取SATURN试验的样本。使用ReadMax方法对样品进行的分析表明,与肿瘤不是RM FISH +:PFS危险比的患者相比,ReadMax FISH阳性(RM FISH +)肿瘤的患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)有所改善RM FISH +(HRs)为0.52,而非RM FISH +为0.93; OS HR分别为0.69和0.92。对于PFS,SATURN厄洛替尼组中RM FISH +的HR而非RM FISH +的HR为0.53(p = 0.003)。尽管未发现EGFR野生型疾病患者的EGFR基因扩增,但EGFR野生型人群的PFS和OS结果也相似(PFS HR分别为0.63和0.96; OS HR分别为0.61和0.84)。预测治疗结果,这是出乎意料的,但并非史无前例。未发现KRAS状态影响结果。需要进一步的经验来完善ReadMax方法并充分确定其有效性和鲁棒性。总之,用于识别EGFR FISH阳性NSCLC患者的ReadMax评分系统是一种很有前途的技术,可以改善晚期NSCLC患者(尤其是EGFR野生型肿瘤)的治疗选择和结局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号