...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >The Effect of a Patient- and Family-Centered Care Curriculum on Pediatrics Residents' Patient-Centeredness
【24h】

The Effect of a Patient- and Family-Centered Care Curriculum on Pediatrics Residents' Patient-Centeredness

机译:以患者和家庭为中心的护理课程对儿科居民以患者为中心的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

What was known A patient- and family-centered approach to care is important in enhancing quality, but little is known about the effectiveness of formal teaching approaches.;What is new Exposure to a patient- and family-centered curriculum did not increase pediatrics residents' self-perceived patient-centeredness. Residents showed a high degree of patient-centeredness before and after the intervention.;Limitations Single-site, single-specialty study limits generalizability; the pretest-posttest design did not guard against external factors that may influence results.;Bottom line Pediatrics residents perceived themselves as patient centered, with female residents scoring higher on the sharing dimension, and both sexes scoring equally on the caring dimension of patient-centeredness.;Introduction The Institute of Medicine's (IOM's) report Crossing the Quality Chasm1 included patient- and family-centered care (PFCC) as 1 of the 6 aims for improvement for the nation's health care system. The report challenged health care organizations to pursue these aims through system redesign, including innovative educational strategies to better prepare the health care workforce to participate in improvement and practice patient- and family-centered care. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)2 also has emphasized the importance of PFCC, emphasizing an approach that encourages mutually beneficial collaboration among patients, families, and health care professionals. Despite the recommendations from the IOM and the AAP to increase the emphasis on PFCC and increasing efforts of medical schools to teach communication and professionalism, students may leave medical school more “doctor or disease centered” than when they enter.3 In contrast, there is a growing body of literature that describes improved outcomes with a patient- and family-centered approach to health care. Specifically, parental presence during procedures,4,5 parental involvement post procedure,6 and active involvement of child life specialists during hospitalization7 all have demonstrated important benefits for patients. Despite this evidence, there is no common road map for teaching these skills. To address this knowledge gap, the pediatrics residency program and family members on staff at Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics in Kansas City, Missouri, designed a PFCC curriculum.3;Methods Setting and Participants Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics is a free-standing children's hospital with a fully accredited pediatrics residency program. The study used a nonrandomized control group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design. The experimental group consisted of the entire group of 24 categorical pediatrics interns beginning residency in 2009, and the control group consisted of all 22 categorical pediatrics residents graduating from residency that same year. Residents could opt out if they chose not to participate in the research study.;Results Twenty-four interns (100%) completed the precurriculum PPOS and 23 interns (100%) completed the postcurriculum PPOS. One intern transferred programs after the first year and the data were not included in any of the analyses. The experimental group included 17 women (74%) and 6 men (26%). The control group consisted of 17 of 22 graduating residents (78%) who completed the PPOS. This included 10 women (59%) and 7 men (41%) in the control group. The mean (±SD) total PPOS score for the experimental group before exposure to the curriculum was 4.6 (±0.43). The range of total PPOS scores was 3.7 to 5.6. Interns scored similarly in the sharing domain (mean of 4.6 [±0.52]) and the caring domain (mean of 4.7 [±0.4]). Female interns (4.8?±?0.36) were more patient centered than male interns (4.2?±?0.38) (P??=??.005) and scored significantly higher than the men (4.8?±?0.39 versus 4.0?±?0.46) in the sharing domain (P??=??.001). There was no difference in female and male interns in the caring domain (P??=??.11). The mean (±SD) total PPOS score for the
机译:以患者和家庭为中心的护理方法对于提高质量很重要,但对正规教学方法的有效性知之甚少。什么是新的以患者和家庭为中心的课程暴露并没有增加儿科住院医师以患者为中心的自我感觉。居民在干预前后表现出高度的以患者为中心。局限性单点,专项研究限制了推广性。前测-后测设计并没有防范可能影响结果的外部因素。底线儿科居民认为自己以患者为中心,女性居民在共享维度上得分较高,而两性在以患者为中心的护理维度上得分均相同。;引言医学研究所(IOM)的报告“跨越质量鸿沟1”包括以患者和家庭为中心的护理(PFCC),这是改善国家卫生保健系统的6个目标之一。该报告向卫生保健组织提出挑战,要求他们通过重新设计系统来实现这些目标,包括创新的教育策略,以更好地为卫生保健工作人员做好准备,以参与改善和实践以患者和家庭为中心的护理。美国儿科学会(AAP)2还强调了PFCC的重要性,强调了鼓励患者,家庭和医疗保健专业人员之间互利合作的方法。尽管IOM和AAP建议加强对PFCC的重视,并加大医学院在教学中的沟通和专业素养的努力,但离开医学院时,学生可能比进入医学院时更“以医生或疾病为中心”。3相反,有越来越多的文献描述了以患者和家庭为中心的医疗保健方法改善了预后。具体而言,在手术过程中的父母身分,4、5手术后的父母参与,6和儿童生命专家在住院期间的积极参与7都显示出对患者的重要益处。尽管有这些证据,但没有共同的路线图来教授这些技能。为了解决这一知识鸿沟,密苏里州堪萨斯市儿童仁慈医院和诊所的儿科住院医师计划及其工作人员的家人设计了PFCC课程。3;方法设置和参与者儿童仁慈医院和诊所是一家独立的儿童医院。拥有完全认可的儿科住院医师计划。该研究采用了非随机对照组的前测后测准实验设计。实验组由2009年开始居住的24名分类儿科实习生组成,对照组则包括同一年从居住地毕业的22名分类儿科住院医师。结果如果选择不参加研究,居民可以选择退出。结果24名实习生(100%)完成了课前PPOS,23名实习生(100%)完成了课后PPOS。第一年后有一个实习生转移了程序,数据未包含在任何分析中。实验组包括17名女性(占74%)和6名男性(占26%)。对照组由完成PPOS的22名应届毕业生中的17名(占78%)组成。对照组包括10名女性(59%)和7名男性(41%)。在暴露于课程表之前,实验组的PPOS总平均得分为4.6(±0.43)。 PPOS总分的范围是3.7至5.6。实习生在共享领域(平均4.6 [±0.52])和关心领域(平均4.7 [±0.4])的得分相似。女性实习生(4.8±±0.36)比男性实习生(4.2±±0.38)更以患者为中心(P ?? =≤0.005),并且得分明显高于男性(4.8±±0.39 vs 4.0±±)。共享域中的(0.46)(P≥0.001)。在护理领域中,男性和女性实习生没有差异(P ?? =?0.11)。 PPOS的平均(±SD)总得分

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号