...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >The Courteous Consult: A CONSULT Card and Training to Improve Resident Consults
【24h】

The Courteous Consult: A CONSULT Card and Training to Improve Resident Consults

机译:有礼貌的咨询:一张咨询卡和培训,以改善居民咨询

获取原文
           

摘要

Editor's Note: The online version of this article contains the survey instrument used in this study.;Introduction Physician engagement in interprofessional consults that involve high-quality communication and courtesy is a critical aspect of patient care.1,2 Clear communication is critical for conveying the reason for the consultation and requires understanding of pertinent medical information as well as displaying good interpersonal skills.3 With the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's new milestones,4 skills in consultation are more explicitly defined, requiring that medical residents “[provide] consultation services for patients with basic and complex clinical problems.”5 Yet physician trainees often are undertrained and underprepared for consult interactions.3,4,6,7 Standardizing the information communicated during consultations may improve the quality of consults, and through this, patient care.3,8–10 The aim of this study was to develop and assess the feasibility of a training session and pocket guide for calling consults. The goals were (1) to assess residents' views on calling and responding to consults and the impact of consults on patient care, and (2) to develop a feasible, robust, and innovative method of training in calling consultations.;Methods The study was performed at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York between October 2010 and December 2011. The 1001 eligible participants were all medical, surgical, and other residents and fellows. Intervention Our intervention development began with trainee focus groups about consults from October 2010 to January 2011 (results will be reported in a separate manuscript). Next, we developed a survey using the focus group findings, the literature,1 and institutional guidelines.11 The survey was reviewed by experts in the field and was pilot tested with 33 medicine residents to assess understanding and ease of completion. The survey assessed trainees' views on the importance and frequency of experiencing specific consult components during initial consult calls and a consultant's response using a 4-point Likert scale. The final section consisted of 6 questions on the impact of consultation interactions on patient care (provided as online supplemental material). The survey was fielded to trainees from April to May 2011 using SurveyMonkey. Using the results from the focus group and the survey, the authors developed a mnemonic tool to guide trainees in calling consults. Two investigators determined items using an iterative process via consensus; disagreements were resolved via negotiation or with the help of the third author when needed. Authors determined components that were most critical to the consult call by reviewing items rated “most important” by approximately 50% or more of the trainees in both the consult call and the response sections (table?1). The items rated most highly in our survey were compared with components addressed in Goldman's 10 Commandments1 and our institutional policy11 to create items in 7 categories. Investigators then ordered the categories. For example, because “reason for consult” is the most critical component of the consult call, yet is often overlooked, this should happen early on during the consult call, right after the introduction of the team and patient. Finally, the categories were crafted into phrases that fit into the CONSULT mnemonic (a word easily remembered in this context): Contact the consultant courteously, Orient (to the patient), Narrow question, Story (history of present illness and hospital course), Urgency, Later (plan for follow-up), and Thank you. The CONSULT card included the mnemonic, examples of phrasing, and important tips for the caller (figure). View larger version (40K) FIGURE CONSULT Card (Front and Back);Results Of 1001 residents and fellows, 403 (40%) responded. Trainees were evenly distributed across sex, postgraduate year, and residency type. Although many of the items were dee
机译:编者注:本文的在线版本包含了本研究中使用的调查工具。医师在跨行业咨询中的介入,涉及高质量的沟通和礼貌是患者护理的关键方面。1,2清晰的沟通对于传达信息至关重要3有了研究生医学教育认可委员会的新里程碑,[4]更加明确地定义了咨询技巧,要求医疗居民“ [提供]咨询”。 “ 5然而,医师受训者经常缺乏培训和咨询互动的准备。3、4、6、7标准化咨询期间传达的信息可能会提高咨询质量,并因此提高患者护理质量。 .3,8–10这项研究的目的是发展和评估可行性培训课程和呼叫咨询的袖珍指南。目标是(1)评估居民对致电咨询和回应咨询的意见以及咨询对患者护理的影响,以及(2)开发一种可行,健壮和创新的培训咨询方法的方法。这项研究于2010年10月至2011年12月在纽约西奈山的伊坎医学院进行。1001名符合条件的参与者均为医疗,外科以及其他居民和同伴。干预我们的干预开发始于从2010年10月至2011年1月的受训学员焦点小组,其内容涉及咨询(结果将在单独的手稿中进行报告)。接下来,我们使用焦点小组的调查结果,文献1和机构指南进行了调查。11该调查由该领域的专家进行了审查,并由33名住院医师进行了试点测试,以评估其理解程度和完成难度。该调查评估了学员对初次咨询电话期间体验特定咨询组件的重要性和频率的看法,并使用4点李克特量表对顾问的回应进行了评估。最后一部分由6个问题组成,这些问题涉及咨询互动对患者护理的影响(作为在线补充材料提供)。这项调查是从2011年4月至2011年5月使用SurveyMonkey进行的。利用焦点小组和调查的结果,作者开发了一种助记符工具来指导受训者致电咨询。两名调查员通过协商一致的迭代过程确定了项目。通过协商或在需要时在第三作者的帮助下解决了分歧。作者通过审查咨询电话和响应部分(表1)中大约50%或更多受训人员的“最重要”项目,确定了对咨询电话最关键的组件。将我们调查中评分最高的项目与高盛的《十诫》 1和我们的机构政策11中涉及的组成部分进行了比较,从而创建了7个类别的项目。然后调查人员对这些类别进行了排序。例如,由于“咨询理由”是咨询电话中最关键的组成部分,但却经常被忽略,因此,这应该在咨询电话的早期,即在引入团队和患者之后进行。最后,将类别编入适合CONSULT助记符(在此情况下很容易记住的单词)的短语:礼貌地联系顾问,定向(对患者),狭窄的问题,故事(当前病史和住院过程),紧迫性,稍后(后续计划)和谢谢。咨询卡包括助记符,短语示例和给呼叫者的重要提示(图)。查看大图(40K)图咨询卡(正面和背面);结果1001居民和同伴中,有403人(占40%)答复。受训者按性别,研究生年份和居住类型平均分配。虽然很多物品都是迪

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号